10
Products
reviewed
474
Products
in account

Recent reviews by ExaKel

Showing 1-10 of 10 entries
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
27.9 hrs on record
Great game but the only thing is that it wouldn't let me give the bottle of vodka that I carried all the way through the game to Russel.
Posted 8 March.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
1 person found this review helpful
4.9 hrs on record
Interesting take on a detective/crime scene investigation game. The setting is like Altered Carbon but with a 50s aesthetic and futuristic tech that people in the 50s would imagine the future to be. It's a nicer pace than a generic shooter.
Posted 20 September, 2024.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
12.8 hrs on record (6.2 hrs at review time)
The Turing Test: it's like Portal set in the world of Interstellar but without the physics babble of black holes and time travel.
Posted 4 September, 2016.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
2 people found this review helpful
2.2 hrs on record
If you're looking for a decent ghostbusters game that is respectful to the franchise then this is it!
Posted 17 July, 2016.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
3 people found this review helpful
18.8 hrs on record (9.3 hrs at review time)
Early Access Review
For those who expected a lot from this F2P adaptation of Ghost in the Shell you might be disappointed, though taking it for what it is this game is quite fun to play.
Posted 15 December, 2015.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
2 people found this review helpful
21.7 hrs on record (13.2 hrs at review time)
When it comes to the singleplayer: it's still the same standard affair that you know and love (and hate). Multiplayer is definitely interesting with the verticality and the usage of the exo suits but apart from that it is still the same.

This time the PC version is quite playable and it isn't the failure that is Ghosts to which COD jumped the shark last year.

To sum this release up: It is like injecting adrenaline (or epinephrine to be precise) into a dying horse while you're still beating it to death.

In other words, while the introduction of the exo suits and the verticality mechanics that come with it attempt to inject life into the franchise and rejuvenate it, the fact that it's on its 11th release and still sticking with tried and true methods and techniques shows that COD is really dying and needs to be put on the back burner like MOH.

But I would still get it now if just for the heck of it!
Posted 8 November, 2014.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
7 people found this review helpful
8.9 hrs on record (7.0 hrs at review time)
While the story isn't oscar award winning material or gameplay is a bit repetitive, I see it as a fun popcorn flick type of game where you're having mindless fun with the gratuitous gore.
Posted 10 October, 2014.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
2 people found this review helpful
39.4 hrs on record (23.9 hrs at review time)
It's ok for a batman game but it doesn't compare to the games developed by Rocksteady.
Posted 4 April, 2014.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
10.4 hrs on record (8.6 hrs at review time)
Like many people here I have been with the franchise since it began in 2003 but now I feel that the once great developer Infinity Ward (more like Infinitely Wasted) has let down the dedicated fan following with this iteration of the series if it can be called that.

When I started playing the game it had horrible fps drops which still exist and that's not acceptable for a PC port from such a developer. Not only are there frequent fps drops but they happen in the same places and this started to stink of poor optimization by the developers. Besides that, the texture quality is totally overrated for a 2013 game: it's nowhere near on par with the likes of Battlefield 4 (all problems with that game aside) where the graphics warranted the beefy system requirements, this game has high specifications but the graphics don't justify having them to begin with which I think is a waste and outright false advertising.

That being said I can't even find a way to display the game's fps...like as if the developers intentionally blocked it because they know their game is terrible.

What has annoyed me about this game the most is the story: while previous games have had some pretty outlandlish plot lines, the story in this game's singleplayer campaign is so stupid that it really didn't provide anything exciting...the Michael Bay explosion-fests are getting boring. What put the cherry on top was the ending - it was such a cheap move that it was practically screaming "sequel". Considering this story was written by a Hollywood screenwriter you'd think it would be something decent...but no, it's just dumbed down to allow for the stupid explosion-fests.

Is it worth getting this game? I don't think so. You may as well get Battlefield 4 or wait for Titanfall and have fun in those games than in COD: Ghosts.
Posted 23 January, 2014.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
19.4 hrs on record (7.0 hrs at review time)
while the release day version does have a few limitations, it is still a fun hack, slash, and stab game in the world of Metal Gear.
Posted 10 January, 2014.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
Showing 1-10 of 10 entries