安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Which is where the contention comes from, as a system suite systemd is restrictive for Unix virtuosi who are used to tailoring a system with wit, ingenuity, and a prayer alongside a couple dozen unrelated packages. systemd makes such knowledge useless.
The faction that thinks that systemd is Linux's Hiroshima claims the added functionality as bloated, unnecessary, and dangerous - as it is all under development in one project.
All the systemd jokes stem from the comprehensiveness as a low level system suite. People against it love to joke that one day systemd will become its own kernel.
https://soundcloud.com/raggle-fraggle/justin-timberlake-is-your
https://youtu.be/XUjikzPv2A4
Bandian!! Vais nous aider!!