41
已評論
產品
914
帳戶內
產品

Tekky 最近的評論

< 1  2  3  4  5 >
目前顯示第 31-40 項,共 41 項
10 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
4 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 59.6 小時 (評論時已進行 52.7 小時)
Actually the best game ever made.
張貼於 2016 年 9 月 7 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 15.7 小時 (評論時已進行 15.4 小時)
Behold Square Enix. People who include single-use DLC. People who cut CORE content and throw it into DLC. People who think it's alright to micromanage savegames and have a disgraceful PC port. In a Deus Ex title no less. I mean come on, this is so unaware it's absurd.

If you need to price a game at 80 or 90 dollars to make a profit, then do so. People will purchase your game based on its sales pitch. This one could not have been better, with DE:HR as its predecessor. Nobody will trust another sequel now. Thank you.

Do not lie to people about the price of your game.


Oh, and try actually letting the devs complete their game instead of starting the third game in the reboot and cutting the remaining two thirds of this one. Absolutely disgraceful.
張貼於 2016 年 8 月 30 日。 最後編輯於 2017 年 2 月 5 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 29.9 小時 (評論時已進行 22.4 小時)
It's a pretty good shooter. It's sort of in the style of Combat Arms, but with above average servers, and a lot less confusing nonsense. Being able to purchase permanent gear with GP makes a massive difference. Money is earned at a reasonable rate, and it's quite possible to do excellently with the default set of gear.

Most reviews reference closed beta gameplay, which was absolutely garbage compared to the current offering. Pretty much everything is viable.

With that said, some balancing is still needed. Maps could be better, you can't choose your gamemode, and spawns are atrocious. It's really frustrating to deal with people rushing you in the middle of the map with spawn protection on.


Give it a shot, it's pretty fun. Neople is a good company, and I trust them to make positive desicions for the game, so long as Nexon doesn't get too involved. We all know how that goes.
張貼於 2016 年 8 月 1 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
1 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 364.4 小時 (評論時已進行 272.3 小時)
God bless the M134.
張貼於 2016 年 6 月 28 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
5 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 212.1 小時 (評論時已進行 42.8 小時)
THE GAME IS GOOD.

SO SAYS ZARDOZ YOUR GOD.
張貼於 2016 年 2 月 25 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 29.5 小時 (評論時已進行 4.5 小時)
搶先體驗版評論
This game is essentially incomplete and abandoned. It also has no significant player base to speak of. Very, very, exceptionally poorly handled game.
張貼於 2016 年 1 月 26 日。 最後編輯於 2021 年 6 月 3 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
5 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 131.1 小時 (評論時已進行 48.5 小時)
Reviewers Mad Cause Bad.
張貼於 2015 年 11 月 7 日。 最後編輯於 2015 年 11 月 7 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
1 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 41.0 小時 (評論時已進行 35.7 小時)
HE SUN THE SUN THE SUN THE SUN THE SUN THE SUN THE SUN THE SUN THE SUN THE SUN THE SUN THE SUN T



SUN/10 would go back to the dawn machine again.

Probably.

Probably not.


actuallyitsprettycreepymaybeilljusthuntlifebergs
張貼於 2015 年 4 月 18 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 9.5 小時
Project Sylpheed meets Battlefront II's space battles. The multirace mechanic provides pretty diverse gameplay for something like this, and the number of parts means that you can mitigate some of the negatives associated with each race or go for something very specialized.

It's just a shame that quick battles bother to have a lobby, since teamstacking is almost unavoidable. It's a very fun game when it works and the teams are balanced, but it's difficult to get to that stage.

(also, there are AI battles, and the AI isn't completely mindless most of the time. I've seen a lot of people grind up on these and then go play multiplayer when they are ready, with better gear.)

Personally, I enjoy it.
張貼於 2014 年 9 月 4 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
57 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 38.6 小時 (評論時已進行 6.9 小時)
You can drive around the grand canyon in a pseudo-monster truck made from a converted supercar.
張貼於 2014 年 8 月 31 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
< 1  2  3  4  5 >
目前顯示第 31-40 項,共 41 項