533 people found this review helpful
6 people found this review funny
3
4
4
3
3
10
Not Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 21.0 hrs on record (10.0 hrs at review time)
Posted: 2 Jan, 2022 @ 12:53pm

After I watched Crowbcat's video on Back4Blood, I immediately stopped playing and uninstalled it.

Valve is on record for saying that they only make games to solve unique problems that they see in video games. After watching that video from Crowbcat, it is abundantly clear that Valve was the reason why Left4Dead was successful, not Turtlerock.

Left4Dead came out in 2008, 13 years before Back4Blood, and it does pretty much everything better. Do not waste your time with this lazy reboot when L4D and L4D2 are better in every possible way.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
57 Comments
Unknown 16 Oct, 2022 @ 4:58am 
reasons why you should watch a few videos about the game before buying
Agenttech4774 18 Jul, 2022 @ 1:59pm 
i mean he is right l4d2 is better
Balkan Jesus 14 Mar, 2022 @ 10:18pm 
Bro had 10 hours and deleted the game because some youtuber didn't like it. What a moron :steamfacepalm:
Dominare 2 Mar, 2022 @ 10:21am 
you stopped playing because someone on youtube told you a game you obviously were enjoying was bad?

what a sheep lol
Me4tWag0n 21 Feb, 2022 @ 4:05pm 
THIS game isnt made by the TRUE "Creators of Left4Dead". Its made by the 5 bootlickers who got coffee for the creators of Left4Dead.
The Editor 30 Jan, 2022 @ 3:24pm 
@demonmustang Probably because he didn't notice the issues with it before watching it and notices the issues now and thus doesn't wanna play it anymore. :boomer:
DemonMustang 29 Jan, 2022 @ 10:51am 
So... did YOU like the game? Why would you uninstall it and stop playing it just because someone else said something about the game? I don't know man, I kind of have my own brain and I make my own decisions, weird huh... 🤷‍♂️
HUSAM 29 Jan, 2022 @ 7:40am 
too much copium :ujel:
Xipluv 29 Jan, 2022 @ 4:01am 
@oLaudix "a) 10h is not enough to make an opinion about the game because you didnt test the system enough"

This is not a fair claim for 99% of games. That 1% is stuff like SS13, Dwarf Fortress, Aurora 4X, etc which extensive training, teaching, and learning to even engage with at the most basic level.

1. If a game fails to engage you with its core loop within 10 hours, the game has fundamentally failed to communicate itself.

2. If the game "Changes later on and is better" or similar, then it has put itself in the position where you either like a core loop which will disappear or you go through a poor core to reach "the good part".

3. If someone spends extensive playtime to understand those systems (say, 50+h), then people will WITHOUT FAIL say "Oh but you spent <time> on game some clearly it can't be as bad as you say it is![/b].

You can tell if a game is worth your time after playing it for over half of a waking day.
Sawboss 29 Jan, 2022 @ 3:23am 
It's good we have youtubers to tell us what our opinions are.