3
已評論
產品
17
帳戶內
產品

«BBQ» Prophet #CorruptionAfoot 最近的評論

目前顯示第 1-3 項,共 3 項
5 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 60.2 小時 (評論時已進行 59.6 小時)
Very solid game.
張貼於 2018 年 11 月 5 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
13 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
4 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 2,373.1 小時 (評論時已進行 1,748.8 小時)
CS:GO 評論
This game is proof that Valve is greedy and lazy:
- Bans are only for the account, not the computer (so anyone willing to spend money is rewarded, even the hackers who make the experience awful)
- The convoluted and mysterious "ELO" rank-determination system effectively prevents anyone with a history of bad performance from ranking up (so as a low-or-normal-skill/improving player you have to buy the game again and hope you do well [very likely against high-skill players in low ranks] OR as a high-skill player, you can intentionally do poorly initially to stay in low ranks forever and stomp, even though a system as simple as relative K:D would be much more effective and fix virtually all rank-related problems)
- Unranked/new accounts/players don't get their own matches; they get put with the lowest ranks (so high-skill players get to automatically stomp low-skill players, compounding the near-impossibility of ranking up)
- Items can't be traded for a week after receiving them (because rather than doing any amount of work to eliminate third-party gambling sites, Valve screwed everyone invested in items by wrecking the game's economy to avoid litigation it completely deserved through its negligence)
張貼於 2016 年 12 月 22 日。 最後編輯於 2018 年 10 月 8 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 20,740.0 小時 (評論時已進行 17,862.5 小時)
This game was once great.
Unfortunately, Valve is incredibly lazy and has forsaken actual development in favor of community-created [99% garbage] content and only listens to whiners on Reddit for totally-unnecessary weapon balances. Additionally, the lack of Marketability on all items left room for third-party entities to usurp authority over trading as monopolistic titans, providing pseudo-convenience and false security at the cost of enjoyability and profitability for anyone not involved in the conspiracy.
張貼於 2015 年 7 月 1 日。 最後編輯於 2018 年 10 月 8 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前顯示第 1-3 項,共 3 項