Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
as of the last time i checked as i own the version that includes being able to play the single player campaign there is currently a few of the missions released for those who own the Deluxe Edition i have played these i would not of written about them if i had not.
and i have actually played more of the multiplayer since i wrote this review and it has become more balanced since then.
How is this a "Review" if you haven't touched multiplayer, when singleplayer isn't even in existence yet? Please rectify.
"I am extremely happy that we are /going to/ get a proper campaign" How do you know this to be true? Do you find it to be ethical to write a positive review of a product that you yourself have not played, and which is not yet feature-complete?