Recent reviews by Dashesano

Thank god, I thought this would never happen.

Personally, I think Reach on PC is great. I haven't experienced the lag or hitreg issues others have experienced on multiplayer, and with the exception of forge, which is apparently coming later, it feels, like halo, on PC, its great. The controls have a steep learning curve if you don't want to remap any of the buttons, but after a bit of tinkering the controls can be comparable to most shooters.

For starters: One of the laziest PC ports I've ever seen. Thats the tldr for you guys. Now into detail.
As someone who hasn't played CoD before, but plays other FPSs on PC, I wasn't sure what I was expecting from this game. I was hoping for something like a better H&G, however after less than an hour I'm incredibly dissapointed. Here's the rundown
Pros:
-If you're really desperate for an FPS this'll do just fine.
Cons:
-Vertical and Horizontal mouse sensativity sliders. Am I playing on an xbox or a PC!?
-Horrible optimization, couldn't hit over 40fps (6700k and sli 1070s) and the graphics sliders did nothing
-Appears to be client side hit detection, which I can forgive in some games like Overwatch because its good hit detection, but here its just, bad, really bad, latency will get you killed more than on an FPS like CSGO PLEASE make dedicated servers
-The 'divisions' are really limiting, and just locks down the experience, in a BETA, where you should be allowed to stress the game
-Dot sights in WW2, I dont think the stg44 had them, but I'm no history expert
-Women on the front line in WW2, I don't think that, was a thing
-No Nazis, really, they're called 'Krauts' and there's 0 swastikas or any depictions, if I had no clue what WW2 was and I learned it only from playing this game, I'd think that the Allies were fighting some people called the 'Krauts' why?
-A serious lack of guns, I know it's a beta and isn't a finished product, but still, to my knowledge there's less guns than CSGO and that game wont be priced at $60 ever.
Summary:
This game isn't what I would call a 'quality FPS', from someone who started out playing halo and then moved to PC shooters, this game doesn't have the replay value that other shooters have, the annoying bugs and hiccups of the game I could look past if it was f2p or NOT $60, if you want WW2 combat get Heroes and Generals, its free to play, you dont have to pay 60 bucks for a game with incredible shortcomings.

I'm going to write this for the old version of halo wars that I used to play on Xbox 360. This has better graphics and as of now, works just fine.
The story is rather good, and the controls are very 'Age of Empires'-like (as its made by the same studio). Also its rather fun and simple to pick up as someone new to RTSs as the controls are well mapped and straightforward.
Pros:
-Easy to pick up as a newcomer
-Good multiplayer
Cons:
-None as of yet

You solve puzzles on an island suffering severe climate change

Edit 9/18/2019:
Seriously Rockstar, another launcher, that breaks the ability to play offline mode and won't let the game load in my case. Come on Rockstar, I've put nearly a thousand hours into this game, but I have to give it a thumbs down because of how bad this latest move is.
Pros:
-Fun, large open world
-Hours and hours of driving
-Online Heists
Cons:
-Waiting 2 hours for GTA Online to load
-Hackers... Hackers everywhere

A combination of graphics, voice acting, and story keep this game going, and although it melts my 7970, its graphics and story in my mind are its largest selling points

Although graphics aren't up to par with other games made around that time period. The grappling mechanic is sort of buggy, and the aircraft handling is a little wonky, but besides that, its really fun to play, hard to advance in missions though.

Just, really funny

Didn't Play it that much.