Последние обзоры STEP BRO?

Not a bad game when you have downloaded SFO from the steam workshop..

Pro's:
Dino's
Visually pleasing
Animation's are good
Sound Affects good

Con's
Maps are small
Not a great deal of content
Little to no micromanaging
Lack of map choices
Lack of buildings
Lack of any thing to do
Animations are good, just repetative
Limited in park design
Really boring campaign
Side quest's are tedious
Cant pause the game (Unless you hit [esc] which is counter productive)
Very little replayability

(Personally i can probably find a few more pro's and allot more con's. I found this game boring. Compared to the first Jurassic theme park game, which i have countless hours on. If you are hoping the game is any thing like the previous Jurassic park game, then i am sorry to say it is not).

I Really don't know.

It is Total War: Attila Age of Charlemagne, with more work put into it.
The best way i can describe this game, is its a very good mod. It feels as if, some one working at CA, really liked Age of Charlemagne, and in his free time he made a new version of it.

It has some new features. The game feels different. Micromanaging food, estates and governors is cool and a step in the right direction i think. Armies are heavily dependant on food surplus, which i personally love (Prevents stacking and easy wipe).

The game is quite confusing and overwhelming on you're first play through. The UI and layout of just every thing is a little odd. And most things have little explanation. A vet to Total War will struggle with this on his/her first few hours of game play.

The AI feels like it has regressed. It feels easy and predictable. This is largely due to the fact the AI cant spam stacks of units. And you start to notice very quickly the lack of intelligence with the AI. The game feels like it should be a slower pace game, though it surprisingly is not. I was half expecting a Game of Thrones feel. Heavy in the politics and intrigue. Though that was lacking.

The game is alright. I personally think the campaign is pretty. The Units are copied and pasted from Attila (Which to me is ok). The game is not user friendly. Battle maps feel more (Total War: Warhammer) which is cool. Overall, its just alright.

Is it worth buying? Is it worth the money? Yes its worth buying, but buy it on a 40%+ sale.

Dayz is still broken. Though they have aparently spent 5 years making this new engine, it still runs poorly. Dayz is still festering with 5 year old bugs. Some thing that seems to be denounced on the forums by their community managers.

Community managers also actively remove posts on the forums that seem negative. They will give a weird answer like"falsehood" or "insulting" which neither usually happen (unless they are refering to the devs having their ego's hurt).

The developers dont work with the community. And ofcource they seem to dissapear for 4 years at a time.
They have rolled out content that is broken (Base building - loot stashing). - 5 years you had to think about it lads, c'mon -

The most problematic part of Dayz is the bugs. You can spend minuets, hours or days looting, surviving, killing, to then die to the most random bug. A bug that has been exsisting for years.

It was a long wait, but this is why you dont support early access.

Suprisingly addictive.
Not a bad WW2 FPS.

Graphically a bit poop.
Collision on MANY assets is garbage.


You will find the community votes for Dog Red and Crete far to much (two maps that are over played).

All in all, its a great filler game. And for its price its a big thumbs up!