Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Communicates reasonably well, but not someone you would choose to present a case effectively or to get across detailed instructions. kyo generally seems to listen to others and take on board their views. kyo habitually plans and sequences own work but not that of others. Ensures that objectives are clearly established, and that work is systematically carried out in order to achieve the objectives. When a topic is unfamiliar or new concepts are put forward, kyo engages in the conversation, but contributions show a lack of understanding at first. Needs to make more effort to listen, learn and adjust. kyo likes to work with problems and enjoys problem-solving sessions. They present ideas and solutions but these are sometimes limited or unworkable.
👑 + 🕺 = 🚘