Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I would advise taking a look at the EU4 Wiki, it contains a lot of useful information, especially on personal unions and diplomacy in general.
As for age being a factor with conception, I doubt they will ever implement it based on the sole factor of it'd be a boring and annoying mechanic. It's already a problem that RNG screws you and you have a 1-2-1 ruler for 70 years.
Now you want to add a mechanic that when this awful ruler goes above the age of 60 he can't get an heir, further ruining someones game.
Just imagine you are this person, you start a game of EU4, get a terrible ruler for 70-80 years, only for him to die at 75 years of age with no heir causing your country to become part of a PU.
That's just going to drive the more casual audience of the game away.
Even some of the more dedicated people could quite easily be driven away by such a bad mechanic.
I personally have had countless times where my ruler is 60+ and finally gets an heir.
using your idea, all of these times I would have been screwed over hard.
I would suggest trying out Crusader Kings II if the more detailed politics and diplomacy is of your interest, EU4 is 100% more focused on the Empire building conquer fest side of Paradox games, while CK2 is more of what you describe with your suggestions.
I hope this helps.
- Daniel