Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
some ppl prefer selling all/more games in one go, the seller should be allowed to do what's convenient for them instead of having multiple seperate transactions for individual $.25 games
Edit: Like kijib said, it's about convenience. I host for another community and I generally only sell to this group when I have extras (usually at a better price so they sell like hotcakes). If I was a designated host for GroupBuys, that would be a completely different story.
And like what ^ said, if you're selling your bundles you'd probably prefer to get it over with quickly rather than spending a great deal amount of time dealing with each person.
Besides, another host will probably appear since the demand is so great.
Who knows, maybe the person buying in bulk is gonna do a mass giveaway? Maybe.
Buying multiple games from a host is still fine.
But I think what Pipken is talking about is, when people buying multiple copies of bundles from a host at happy hour.
The same logic applies. Imagine you have 20 bundles and take 5 mins to deal with each person.
Would you rather deal with one person or twenty?
Still i'm not happy till I get my bundle :<
Are we gonna have to wait for that person to sell it back to the market with marked up prices? I just hope we there's another person willing to host another group buy of this.
Else with reserving one game and someone snatching up 3? People are doing a service for you at a loss to theirselves. I don't feel that under any circumstance a splitter should be forced to pick someone. If you reserve one of the best games in the bundle and someone reserves the same game plus others shittier titles, I'll split with them because they're taking what I perceive as a loss. I usually try to warn buyers that "multiple games take priority."
Ultimately, it's the splitters choice. They paid for the bundle in the first place. The splitter takes on the risk of unsplittable games and take a loss. Scams rarely happen here, but they take on the risk of scams too. As a frequent host of splits, if someone doesn't contact me within a short-while after reserving, their game is available in my mind. I'll warn them first in the post, add them, and edit the post saying "XXX has not contacted me yet." If you're buying a game, it's your responsibility to post and then message me ASAP. I don't want to get stuck with a $0.50 game repeatedly - it adds up.
Ultimately, my goal is to get rid of many games as I can and keep what I want. I had an excel list of ~$45 of leftovers that I ultimately made only $4 on splitting in bulk. If a $5 bundle with 10 games splits @ $0.50 each, I keep whatever I can't sell. Usually I want 2 games and end up getting stuck with 3-4. So I'm paying double what you're paying for what I'm splitting. I clearly have no problem with that, as I get first picks. If you want first picks and to guarantee the titles you want, buy the bundle yourself and split it. That's what splitters have to do.
The only thing I think should be a rule (if not a decency), is if a buyer promises to buy or a seller promises to buy/sell, they keep their promise. Nothings worse than someone contacting you in steam, they tell you that they'll split/buy the game, and then they back out or sell to someone else.
That being said, I think it'd be an acceptable decency for buyers to disclose how many copies of games they've bought. I've seen people snatch up 2-3 copies of games and not let anyone else get them. I'd rather my game go to someone who wants it than someone who doesn't.
And with the limitations Indiegala seem to be implementing, demands just gonna be greater than before.