You're admitting that Romney was a bad governor, and saying that that makes him more qualified than a senator who did no harm?

@His Mitt really has no decent qualification. And it is true that Obama was criticized for a lack of experience in 2008, but he has turned out to be pretty good at the job in my opinion.

I never said he killed businesses. -.-
And being a bad governor does not qualify you for anything.

I looked up Warren Harding's presidency, found the info on the economy and the recovery during his term, and it said "Recovery did not last long. Another economic contraction began near the end of Harding's presidency in 1923, while tax cuts were still underway. A third contraction followed in 1927 during the next presidential term."

The roaring twenties were due to many different factors, not just one stimulus that included tax cuts. You simply cannot say that ONE action created a huge boom. It's much more complicated than that.

@His I am not denying any of the facts you just presented me. But running a successful business does not qualify you for running a country, because a country/government is not a business.

Also, you forgot Bill Clinton. :P

Not an economy as bad as this one. And Ronald Reagan increased the debt with his tax cuts, so he later had to raise taxes. Warren Harding's recovery only lasted for 2 years until another economic slowdown happened, and his tax cuts only worked for 2 years because of a different economic climate. The recession he had was extremely small compared to the Great Recession Obama inherited. And the world economy was smaller back then. Things were different 100 years ago. What worked then won't necessarily work now.

I don't think you understand what exactly a company like Bain Capital is. It's a private equity, venture capital firm. What some would call a "corporate raider", because what they do is literally take over the management of companies, and make them more effecient and maximize profits.

Historygenius, he mean't the three countries, but he said three bad examples because you listed the Baltic countries in one "word". And that's not the point. There is no system of government, economy, or anything that ALWAYS works no matter where you go or what the situation is. I'm a pragmatist. I look at what works for the individual situation, I don't generalize and say one thing always works and one thing never works.

Bain Capital took over the companies, and in some cases fired workers and dramatically shrank the company to maximize it's profits and efficiency. And about my 6th point, I know that fact very well, but did I not say "He was born into great wealth, which I do NOT have any problem with"? Lol.