Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The start date is most likely going to be the 16h February at 4pm CET/UTC+1, we'll discuss further details about when we meet in the session with everyone present
I assume we will play major nations in europe? Then:
1. Moscovy
2. Brandenburg
3. Spain
Otherwise I will be more or less spontaneous
I think I'll pick either Shimanzu or Ashikaga.
Maybe Usegui if it's still available.
I mean only if everbody's okay with playing worldwide nations.
Looking forward!
I'll be going for England I guess unless someone else wants to (tho would also love Brandenburg I guess :P)
-jianzhou
-mailand (in english milan i gues?!)
-tunis
smth like that
With you as castille he's gonna reach madrid ez :D
Just a couple of points regarding rules since we have some newer players and some experienced players. Can we all discuss and agree what would be best for an enjoyable campaign for all? Some we could implement as hard rules, and others as soft rules or gentlemen's agreements.
War/Peace
1. I was thinking we should discourage territorial gains from other players unless there is a genuine reason for taking them. Such as missions, strategic gains (such as taking a mountain territory on the border or a trade port), cores, culture or religion. In these cases, we should limit what we take and not take 100% war score every time simply because we can.
2. In the spirit of the above, we should outright ban peace deals which take more war score than the victor actually has.
3. We should perhaps discourage (not ban) offensive wars for reasons other than the above, however, allow for hard peace deals when a defensive war is won. It would not be a fun campaign for us all if we see a Germanic nation start eating chunks out of France, or see France start eating chunks out of Castile, or Ottomans eating chunks out of Austria etc.
4. Remember global/world wars only existing since the late 18th/early 19th century and in the spirit of this we should also encourage limited wars, such as colonial wars, trade wars, or wars where the interest is out with the home territories of both countries. For example, we should allow France and England to fight over Canada without turning it into a total war or world war, so long as the peace deal is limited to colonial possessions or trade power, reparations etc. In these cases, we should allow 2 nations to fight one another without all jumping in, unless the strength is absolutely needed. For example, Netherlands joining France to fight a trade war against England.
Alliances/Diplomacy
5. Similar to what I've said in 1 (and what you have said Marco), I think alliances should be limited to nations with genuine mutual interests, and not "oh they have a big army they will keep me safe or allow me to expand". For example, there is little genuine reason for Ottomans to ally with Russia, unless for example we see a very powerful Germanic state who can threaten both. In all other cases, a Russo-Turkish alliance would make the game very boring and would allow both nations to expand unopposed (Yay for me and the Slavs, not so yay for everyone else).
6. We should ban hidden alliances. If two nations want to ally, we should do it publicly. Subterfuge is good and all, and part of the game, but we don’t want to see France declaring war on Britain only to see Austria join after the DoW because of a secret pact.
Game flow
7. Definitely a default of 2 speed and ban pausing unless absolutely necessary. Pausing should only be done by the host for genuine reasons. I don’t think 5 speed will ever work and will cause players to lag and fall behind in date. I’d rather see a consistent 2 speed game without pausing than 4 or 5 speed with people pausing on pop ups.
8. I don't want to tell you when to piss, but I think we should tell people when to piss. We need to have regular breaks. I can go long without breaks myself, so I'll not suggest a frequency, but if we don't organise it there will be frequent pausing.
9. Ledger should not be locked, it’s important for managing your own nation and it’s fair if we can all see it anyway.
10. Save by host only, we don’t want people loading into single player as other nations to spy.