Originally posted by Kptn Howdy (RIP PC):

Originally posted by Pie:

That getting into the groups Discord server you have to talk to a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy's uncle.

You can always, yknow, ask the discord owner?

I did
Nothing
I know for a fact he saw it because he responded to shadow about something.

Originally posted by Stake from Jate Farm:

Originally posted by The Flower-ish Toaster:

Ew TUME sounds like a horrible group with a horrible officer in it.

cough.

In all seriousness, i really don't get that guy. Sometimes he's pretty nice and sometimes he's like the most offensive being that you can procure on the planet.

He also calls people (including me kek) autistic a bunch of times. Kinda annoying after some time.

He's bipolar

I bet that's a lie.

Originally posted by Duckface:

I don't like how childish this group can be at times. No wonder why I'm inactive here.

^

Originally posted by Fanshi:

What there's a discord

SEE!

How they use holidays to their advantage. (Like events and such)

That getting into the groups Discord server you have to talk to a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy who knows a guy's uncle.

He deserves it, one of the worst people I had the worst luck of meeting.

If I loved them enough, and think I could spend the rest of my life with them, then sure.

Originally posted by Pigeonbee:

Originally posted by robomagon:

1. I'm sure a bisexual is perfectly capable of fantasizing about their partner as the opposite gender. I'm also sure that some pedophiles, who are married, have wives, and are apparently capable of getting an errection for said wife (something not even all straight men are capable of) and fathering a child, probably has at least some attraction to the adult female body.

2. While I certainly thank you for actually addressing the question, unfortunately, your answer doesn't really mean much to me. To you it's just a simple question, but to Shadowcon Funded Propaganda, answering honestly would have meant contradicting himself. You see, he answered an earlier question of mine as thus:




See, his solution to the moral dilemma was to simply alter reality in the fantasy so that sex that could not possibly be anything other than rape in the real world, could be consentual in the fantasy. And there would be no problem with the morality of the fantasy.
If he had said yes to the second question then he would have been admitting that simply changing the parameters of the fantasy to fit moral guidelines does not change the morality of having the fantasy in the first place. I would have used that point to get him to further clarify exactly what makes a pedophile's unfulfilled fantasies "wrong" because clearly judging the fantasy by it's content alone doesn't add up. And then we could have continued the debate from there.

3. Of course it was a loaded question. It was a debate. At least 50% of the questions are going to be loaded. The other 50% are just going to lead to loaded questions. That's kind of how debates work.

4. As for it not hurting anybody: A sexual fantasy, existing only in the realm of the mind, can have exactly one ramification on the real world. And you can clean that up with a paper towel. You can call me stupid if you want, but I don't think cleaning up a little spilt semen is really "hurting anybody".

literal kiddy feeler

Why are we even talking about this in the first place, how did this start?

Originally posted by Shadowcon66:

Originally posted by robomagon:

Whould you or would you not have a problem with a pedophile (who we'll assume is also attracted to adults since people can have multiple fetishes and sexual orientations), jerking his meat, fantasizing to the thought of what that little six year old girl is gonna look like all grown up, just barely legal and what he's gonna do to her when she is?

He refuses to give me a yes or no answer. It seems like it should be a pretty simple moral question.

Here's my response to your question from the thread.

Well firstly, a pedophile wouldn't bother trying to think of what that little six year old girl is gonna look like all grown up because he's sexually attracted to prepubescent children.
As a matter of fact, a pedophile would much rather choose to have sex with a child over having to choose an actual adult, so they can embrace feelings of sexual gratification.

I think that it's also creepy to look at a little girl and trying to think about how she'll look when she grows up because that guy would be obsessing over a little girl by that point in time.
Having sexual thoughts about a little girl while trying to imagine what she'll look like is awful.
It doesn't change the fact that it's down right creepy, no matter how you try to put it together.

Either way I would just answer yes because it's purely demoralizing.
It's a shitty loaded question fronted with a strawman to begin with, it's pointless.
You also have to be fucking stupid to convince yourself that it's not hurting anybody, as well.

It is VERY creepy, but you never said the pedophile actually raped someone. you can't just judge someone on something they have never even done. In Japan, I believe they are running campaigns to put pedophiles in therapy so they will not go after children, which is a really good thing, because I am sure all of them don't even want to have that wierd fantasy in their head. I don't care what the hell a pedophile does, as long as they don't fuck an actual child, or make one naked.



my eyes hurt, so sorry if that turned out to rumble and shit or what the hell ever.