Originally posted by (Double backslash) Sister fister:

Fav is lolicon

seconds are
Futa
rape
toddlercon
incest
female orgasm

Originally posted by robomagon:

Yep. It's called pegging IIRC.

Only if it's woman on man action
woman on woman it's just sex

I don't think he's a woman.

Originally posted by Shadowcon66:

Originally posted by Mr. Gency:

Yes, I know it's a perma. Has the reason for the ban been revealed yet or is it literally just because people asked?

Well, Pyrofish was also kicked from the Group.
She was unable to see her own ban reason.
Because she was kicked, she can't view the forums.
This disallows her from viewing what her ban reason is.
To answer your question, yes. She was banned because people literally asked for it.

Originally posted by GoatMasterMason:

Shadow wouldn't be a fuck buck about it if it was done to code.

im sorry man i didn't catch sleep, can you please translate this for me

Originally posted by Amsel :D:

Hasn't she been banned like 5 times in the past?

First ban was actually a permanent one, because we used to have "special rules" back then.
Nobody could agree on the ban, and yet Evoxrus for some reason thinks the ban is relevant; and the point is that the "special rules" system back then was pure dog shit.
-
Second ban was actually from the whole Meat vs Pyrofish conflict in which Meat had specifically asked and kept begging the Mods to ban them both (he was harassing her).
So nobody could actually hold this ban in particular, accountable.
-
Third ban came from her getting into an argument with Evoxrus.
He decided to demonstrate his authority by banning her for a week, for some reason.
We still never actually settled this, and Evoxrus game up trying to PM with her back then.
-
Fourth ban I believe would be the current one, which was unfairly given to her because of some stupid shitty petition that was made by Jake, someone who actually breaks rules.

Technically she could only have been banned for a month.
The Rules & Ban policy completely contradict Pyrofish's newest ban.
She was kicked and permanently banned from the group.
This was all based on Jake's petition, by the way.

I linked it back at the top of the page.
You're able to see many things wrong.
Firstly, we have the person who made the thread.
This poster's name is "Jake", and like Migueleby, Meat Slab, Squeaker and whomever; Jake personally went to go specifically target Pyrofish to "stand up for his friends".
He's actually admitted this himself before, inside of this group.
Jake has been witch-hunting Pyrofish for a long while.
He was banned for flamebaiting, and derailing.
His alternative acc's were eventually banned.
This was because he was evading his ban.

Then we have some things with the thread itself, like how the thread itself was only active for only about four hours... ONLY FOUR HOURS... which is how long it took for the admins to respond to the thread and fulfill the wishes that the majority has beckoned back then.
Think about how much they were willing to participate; and particularly keep Evox in mind.
There were only 16 yes votes competing against 12 no votes.

This is literally just a four unit gap, nothing "overwhelming and decisive" at all
Yet the thread had to be locked, before more had the ability to go and vote.
Now this counter-petition of mine, made for the sake of removing Pyrofish's perma-ban;
has obviously been active for longer than four hours, and the thread itself is still open.
This thread has remained open for more than over 6 hours, and it's still going.
The original thread had about 28 voters in total, while this one has 33 in total.
Secondly and more importantly, my thread has overwhelming support here.

Compared to Jake's thread with 16 vs 12, my thread is literally 26 vs 8. Yep, just 8 no votes.
We have to face the music: that my thread has been up longer, has way more total voters has overwhelming and seemingly almost unanimous vote in favor of Pyrofish; but most importantly is that we've demonstrated that the opposing party has little to no reason for being able to explain and justify the circumstances of the event and of Pyrofish's ban. Meanwhile, again and again we've shown that she could only get banned for about a month at worse; and that is if she ends up breaking a couple of rules that Evo set up. Pyrofish hasn't even broken any rules to warrant such a ridiculous petition to ban her.
I honestly don't see where "petitions to ban people" made by stalkers really fit in the FRC.
In a way I kind of find it really "self-defeating when even the fucking owner promotes it.

Originally posted by robomagon:

That's literally how her cucks try to excuse her constant flaming of any and everyone she comes across.

Isn't this how some people have kept getting away with constantly flaming Pyrofish?
They just go and hide behind some friends who end up doing the same thing later?

Originally posted by Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart:

It was literally because of petition.

Yep, all because of some shit petition.

TL:DR
But you listed 4 bans. 4th is perma. Thems the rules.

75% is nowhere close to unanimous.

I haven't compared the vote lists, but I didn't vote on the last one so I'm not one of the original 16. Which means there are at least another 9 people who haven't voted here yet.

Originally posted by UnofficialAether:

Originally posted by robomagon:

inb4 "she was only calling you that ironically"

even if she was I don't want that ;^;

That's literally how her cucks try to excuse her constant flaming of any and everyone she comes across.

Originally posted by Shadowcon66:

Originally posted by Mr. Gency:

I would've voted no if I had the chance.

Do you know they perma-banned her?
It contradicts the ban policy completely.

I'm pretty sure this is her 4th (at least), so that's supposed to be perma.

Originally posted by UnofficialAether:

I just don't want her to call me a faggot or a shit anymore :(

inb4 "she was only calling you that ironically"

Originally posted by The Extreme Potato:

>TF2

nuff said

:p I'm thinking of finally giving it a try. Should be fun as a completely colorblind, legally blind person who hasn't been good at FPS games since UT99.

Originally posted by UnofficialAether:

Originally posted by Dewa Der Führer | e621.net:

Doesn't that count as bondage?

Bondage is tying people up. It's hard to put someone in a dress if they're tied up.

Don't they tie you into the clothes though? Like with the ankle restraints attached to the shoes and stuff?

Originally posted by Dewa Der Führer | e621.net:

What's the all class pants

The baggies.

He's wearing them in that pic Bangi posted. They're also the closest thing I could find to Robbie Rotten, but unfortunately there's no top with just a vest and no jacket. :(

Originally posted by gabrum01:

Inexistent






Do strap on count?

Yep. It's called pegging IIRC.

Spy doesn't even have any except for one that's for all classes and costs like $9...