Ursprungligen skrivet av Gianfranco Stercoforti:

Wait, what's with Mohammed (spelt wrong) that raped a kid?

I've never heard of it, and I'm muslim myself (sounds stupid, ik).

don't worry, I'm not going to ger triggered because of your opinion lmao I'm not a self-centered religious asshole

There are about four different ways to spell his name in English, and none of them are wrong.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Goldiecon99:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Unicarn:

If your gender is different from your sex, you experience something called gender dysphoria. It causes you to feel distress over your body and can lead to depression and anxiety.

That's why transgender people go to such lengths to transition.

Is this a mental, or neurological problem?

Neither. It's a physical problem.

Cogito ergo sum.

It is the mind that defines a person, not the body. The body can influence the mind, but a person only has personhood because of their mind. Without that, they're just a vegetable.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Goldiecon99:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Unicarn:

There's a difference between gender and sex.

We can't change sex, but we can change gender.

Isn't gender a social construct?

Which means that it can be changed by society and members thereof.

On the subject of political correctness: You seem to have a problem with me referring to her as "she". You also seem to disapprove of political correctness, as do I. So I find it odd that you're acting very PC at the moment. You want others to refer to her as a "he", when it's our right to call her whatever we like. You're trying to correct the political views of others to match your own. To make them refer to things the way you see them rather than the way they see them. That's exactly what I hate about political correctness.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Goldiecon99:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Goldiecon99:

Even more so, you're calling the boy a "she", even though he obviously hasn't met your own criteria of "replacing every part of a woman's body with a man", but you still insist on referring to the boy as a she, and continue insisting that he is in fact a female person.

Why do you keep calling him a "she"?
You admit that "we're not there yet".
He hasn't even met your standards.
Most of his body parts are his own.

Again, those aren't my standards. Sorry for taking so long to clarify that.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Goldiecon99:

Even more so, you're calling the boy a video a "she", even though he obviously hasn't met your own criteria of "replacing every part of a woman's body with a man", but you still insist on referring to the boy as a she, and continue insisting that he is in fact a female person.

I never said that was my personal criteria. I asked that as an extreme scenario to see wether your opinion was based of the persons birth gender or their actual current biological gender. Because science will eventually allow us to change the latter.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Goldiecon99:

Ursprungligen skrivet av robomagon:

The question is regarding every single part of both the ship and the person. It's still the ship that Theseus sailed on despite Theseus never having seen or come into physical contact with any existing part of it? Despite no part of it ever having been in any of the places he'd sailed his ship to? The person is still female despite every single organ, bone, inch of skin, and drop of blood having been replaced with a male version?

I'm not even sure how a person's body parts are as interchangeable as that of a ship, holy lol.
You wouldn't be left with a living organism.

That's why it's a philosophical question. And honestly we probably almost have the cloning and genetic manipulation technology to make a reverse-gendered copy of someone's body. If we ever figured out brain or spinal transplantation we'd be almost there.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Fantaziya:

Ursprungligen skrivet av owen:

this thread isnt useful cos everyone is just asking their friends to stroke their cocks

you're not wrong

True. Hopefully Kirnikovich just decides for himself rather than having a vote. At least that way we'll probably keep the current staff at the very least.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Goldiecon99:

but the question still stands
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79Lb1y1R-IE
would you fuck

Hell no, she's only 14.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Goldiecon99:

Ursprungligen skrivet av robomagon:

I'd like to ask a philisophical question here regarding the ship of Theseus. Plutarch posed the question wether in the process of restoration, if every single piece of Theseus' ship were to be replaced, would it still be the same ship afterward?

So I'll ask, if a person born biologically female were to have every single part of their body replaced a male one, would you still consider that person female?

Firstly, we have to establish we're comparing a human being to a ship.
Then we have to come to the point we're just replacing a woman's body parts with that of a man (which aren't even her own self-produced organs), but nonetheless it's perhaps as effective as replacing a missing leg with a substitute; and in contrast to Theseus' ship where they had replaced the planks of the ship; to the point it was still the same ship but with altercations.
Likewise the ship itself would've still turned out to be different; considering the planks were decaying and as such; Theseus' ship would've still been different in that case.
Regardless, it does not become a completely different ship with either of these altercations;
it's still Theseus' ship in the end; whether the planks are replaced or if they went to rot.
As for the woman who had been imbibed with Male Sex organs, well then you shouldn't forget the fact that a large percentage of her body is still female (bone structure importantly), the answer at the end for here would be tat she too, would still be a woman.
Born as a woman, and die as a woman. As Theseus' ship will still remain as that ship.
Even then, pre-op transgenders identify as being a member of the opposite sex when we clearly know that this is completely untrue; under any and all levels of standards.

The question is regarding every single part of both the ship and the person. It's still the ship that Theseus sailed on despite Theseus never having seen or come into physical contact with any existing part of it? Despite no part of it ever having been in any of the places he'd sailed his ship to? The person is still female despite every single organ, bone, inch of skin, and drop of blood having been replaced with a male version?

Hey, Glodielocks.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Goldiecon99:

What she did was take hormones and whatnot to receive Masculine aesthetics.
This also includes the use of Steroids and Testosterone.
That is why she even looks like a dude.
She's still a woman in the end.

I'd like to ask a philisophical question here regarding the ship of Theseus. Plutarch posed the question wether in the process of restoration, if every single piece of Theseus' ship were to be replaced, would it still be the same ship afterward?

So I'll ask, if a person born biologically female were to have every single part of their body replaced with a male one, would you still consider that person female?