Ursprungligen skrivet av Pyrofish:

Ursprungligen skrivet av robomagon:

He made a judgment call. And managed to get a rule updated to support it. And no punishments were handed out, even to you for spamming this. Just a lock. And the thread in question was still breaking rules 2 and 5 which did exist at the time.

Ok, and again, I am not saying what Awew did was right. My thread was just a response to his post, since he had locked it. He locked my thread for no reason. My thread was not supporting Panda, was not saying he was right, nothing. Just a respone that would have been in the thread if it was not locked.

So you tried to make a new thread to continue one that was justifiably locked. Seems like a good enough reason to lock the new thread to me.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Evoxrus XV:

Alright here we go again, let's get right into your complaint Mrs Pyrofish. What was the context of the thread that awew posted? Title and description? Let me see it.

"Mrs"
>ipmlying someone would actually marry Pyrofish.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Pyrofish:

Ursprungligen skrivet av robomagon:

Did you not just edit the rules to this?

Seems like a moot point to discuss this now. By the updated rule 3 especially combined with 2 and 5 that thread would have gotten locked anyway. It just happened a few hours early.

But that doesn't matter at all, because that rule didn't exist yet. He can't enforce something that isn't a rule.

He made a judgment call. And managed to get a rule updated to support it. And no punishments were handed out, even to you for spamming this. Just a lock. And the thread in question was still breaking rules 2 and 5 which did exist at the time.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Kririkrov:

Just a little warning to the mods, this thread will stay open for discussion, so please no locking or deleting.

Did you not just edit the rules to this?

Ursprungligen skrivet av Evoxrus XV:

2. Do not flamebait or actively start flame wars.

3. Do not post anything illegal in this group (By the Freedom Land Laws). Also, try to refrain from discussing any illegal activities performed by members IRL.

5. Do not insult other members based on things like sexism, racism, religion, homophobia and others unless your making a light-hearted joke.

Seems like a moot point to discuss this now. By the updated rule 3 especially combined with 2 and 5 that thread would have gotten locked anyway. It just happened a few hours early.

Sending our love down the well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbhiLbT_yGo
Sending our love down the well...

Ursprungligen skrivet av Pyrofish:

Ursprungligen skrivet av robomagon:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAAxKxnR6tI

In the part where you said "thoughts" at the end.

The part where it was a reply to Brig should have clued you in to the fact that I was asking him. You know, because I actually respect his opinion on something like that.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Pyrofish:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Dr. Raven:

That's sort of the point of locking a thread though, to not give users a chance to discuss things further, depending on what was being discussed and how people went about it. I didn't see the original locked topic but I'm assuming some flaming went on or whatever. (at least something to justify a lock?)

There was no flamewar.

Yeah, because he wasn't there to flame back. He had already left the group. It was still just a flame thread though.

Oh and look, our glorious new leader just edited the rules:

3. Do not post anything illegal in this group (By the Freedom Land Laws). Also, try to refrain from discussing any illegal activities performed by members IRL.

So shut it.

Ursprungligen skrivet av robomagon:

Y'know, if I actually do get elected/chosen or however Krinki decides to do things, one of the things I'd like to do is make a mod complaint subforum. A place where people can appeal a decision without bringing a bunch of drama into GD or AD. Thoughts?

What a terrible idea.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAAxKxnR6tI

I figure most people over here probably know them more for this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTTsY-oz6Go
Due to the Van Halen version.

http://www.vacbanned.com/view/statistics
Over 2,836,774 served.