Автор сообщения: ❄~Kryzmazz Eve~❄

Автор сообщения: robomagon

Have fun while it lasts. :)

You're starting to weird me out.

Wouldn't you be disappointed if I didn't?

Автор сообщения: dino_inc

Автор сообщения: robomagon

NOTE: I am not calling homosexuality a defect.

It does prevent an organism from reproducing, so it's biologically a defect. It's probably the origin of homophobia.

I am not participating in that debate.

Автор сообщения: ❄~Kryzmazz Eve~❄

Автор сообщения: robomagon

...

Penis.

Hehehe.

Okay.

Have fun while it lasts. :)

Автор сообщения: Unicarn

Автор сообщения: robomagon

Yes, you have explained to me your definitions of those phrases. But the way you describe "agnostic atheists" has nothing at all to do with actual belief in agnosticism. So I'm not sure why you want to use such a confusing definition when "moderate" would work just as well.

That is the definition of agnosticism. You can be an agnostic theist or an agnostic atheist. They are not mutually exclusive.

Atheism:
The belief that there are no god(s).

Agnosticism:
The belief that there may or may not be god(s).

Theism:
The belief that there are god(s).

They seem pretty exclusive to me.

Автор сообщения: ❄~Kryzmazz Eve~❄

Автор сообщения: robomagon

Joyfully elated.

A tiny bit, but that's only because of the inside joke.

...

Penis.

Hehehe.

Автор сообщения: Unicarn

Автор сообщения: robomagon

That is clarified as:

I'm pretty sure that "transfer" is used here in relation to physical location and/or custody.

There is still this, however
"Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group"

While the birth of the person isn't prevented, the birth of people who are a part of the group is prevented.

It'd be like changing the skin color of everyone to white before they're born.

Would you then apply that same definition of genocide to parents who try to prevent birth defects in their unborn children?

NOTE: I am not calling homosexuality a defect.

Автор сообщения: ❄~Kryzmazz Eve~❄

Автор сообщения: robomagon

I know, you told me. But still, admit it, saying penis this much is making you giddy.

Define giddy.

Joyfully elated.

Also:

The law protects four groups - national, ethnical, racial or religious groups.

Автор сообщения: Unicarn

Автор сообщения: robomagon

But there's no -cide (killing) happening. Is circumcision at birth genocide against uncircumcised males?

This is the UN's criteria for whether it's genocide or not.

Killing members of the group
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group

That last one sticks out.

That is clarified as:

Forcible transfer of children may be imposed by direct force or by through fear of violence, duress, detention, psychological oppression or other methods of coercion. The Convention on the Rights of the Child defines children as persons under the age of 14 years.

I'm pretty sure that "transfer" is used here in relation to physical location and/or custody.

Автор сообщения: ❄~Kryzmazz Eve~❄

Автор сообщения: robomagon

You just enjoy having an excuse to say penis, don't you?

No, he really did burn it, a tiny spot.

It needs love and attention, okay?

I know, you told me. But still, admit it, saying penis this much is making you giddy.