Shadowcon66 lähetti viestin:

iVoltaire~•~ FRC lähetti viestin:

Artificial intelligence is stupid and people should stop working on it before they take over humans and make us obsolete

yes and no

yes because it's a waste of fucking money and people who fantasize about it have no clue

no because i don't particularly agree with them taking over human-kind and making us obsolete

Humans always either die or live long enough to become obsolete. What's the difference if the children who inherit the world from us are biological or not?

Geech lähetti viestin:

Stay Frosty My Friend lähetti viestin:

Doesn't look like a dog


But dude
Boobs and vagina

It looks like a Dog, you turn it to the side stupid.

Also Futa involves dicks, stupid

So does straight porn. Thus, straight porn is gay.

Knights of Honor.

Blingie lähetti viestin:

$3.31 can get you a night with me €;

Does that emote mean you have braces?

Amsel :D lähetti viestin:

robomagon lähetti viestin:

There's no genetic diversity in cloning. Every child would be genetically identical to its parent. A single disease could wipe out the entire species. Having two sexes means offspring get a random assortment of genes from both parents. Thus, diversity. And a better chance for survival.

There is no random assortment of genes obtainable from both parents unless all that DNA has already developed. So the benefit from the sexes doesn't come into play until genetic diversity has already been created. We would have to have used mitosis (thanks Aether, that's the word I was looking for) and developed all our DNA and then start to develop the sexes. If we already developed all that DNA then it would be unnecessary for the sexes to develop, as only the well functioning offspring would survive. Sex is only useful because it helps share genes to create people more likely to survive. If those genes already exist, then those genes would thrive the most, making sex unnecessary.

We are not the pinacle of evolution. New genes are still being created the same way they always have. Evolution is a war, and while we may be the kings of the animal kingdom, there are still new strains of bacteria and viruses being created that pose a serious threat to us.

Amsel :D lähetti viestin:

robomagon lähetti viestin:

The lack of genetic diversity being bad for survival, and then the next paragraph saying that being self-cloning would be good for survival.

I don't see how creating sexes increases genetic diversity. It might help a bit with sharing any traits that do survive, but i does not necessarily create more DNA variations. While a self-replicating creature wouldn't even have the trouble of finding a mate.

There's no genetic diversity in cloning. Every child would be genetically identical to its parent. A single disease could wipe out the entire species. Having two sexes means offspring get a random assortment of genes from both parents. Thus, diversity. And a better chance for survival.

Blingie lähetti viestin:

Geech lähetti viestin:

So, yours? :9

Reported for harassment. I honestly feel so attacked right now.

It's a good thing we're not playing GTA5.

Take off your goddamn hats.

You have no excuse not to own Super Hexagon.

Amsel :D lähetti viestin:

robomagon lähetti viestin:

Get some sleep. You're contradicting yourself in your own argument.

Oh shit. Where?

The lack of genetic diversity being bad for survival, and then the next paragraph saying that being self-cloning would be good for survival.