UnofficialAether lähetti viestin:

Potatoe

FTFY

*wonders if anyone will even get the joke*

G_lad lähetti viestin:

Odd, I expected someone to name me.
Now that I posted it the next comment will have my name.

I was named at least once. Get on my level.

Copy That lähetti viestin:

Goldiecon99 lähetti viestin:

?
like the game?
why?

The game is so bad its funny

Hearts and minds! Yeah! *chest bump*

Seriously that game was so funny it was awesome. At least until you switched sides.

Goldiecon99 lähetti viestin:

robomagon lähetti viestin:

So what you're saying is that Muslims carry around a small rug so that they're more comfortable when they have to get down on their knees at least five times a day.

that would make giving bj's easier huh

Muhammad is pretty hard to satisfy.

Stake from Jate Farm lähetti viestin:

Gianfranco Stercoforti lähetti viestin:

That's probably true.

Do you carry a prayer rug around and pray at specific times of the day? :bbtcat:

So what you're saying is that Muslims carry around a small rug so that they're more comfortable when they have to get down on their knees at least five times a day.

Realize that some children in the next generation will be messed up from walking in on their parents having sex in fursuits.

For some reason your country is full of men who like to take it up the ass from women with ridiculously huge strap-ons. Seriously, WTF man?

Goldiecon99 lähetti viestin:

robomagon lähetti viestin:

Whoops. I meant to add more to that part, but it looks like I forgot. Ahem.

I remember hearing about that. But his case actually does more to prove my point than yours. That kids gender was male. His parents tried to push a female gender onto him and look how it turned out. People need to express their genders to be happy. You can't force one on them with therapy and drugs. I can understand the parents mindset because they believed it wouldn't be possible for him to go through life as a man without a penis, but once it bacame clear that he felt like a boy and not a girl they should have respected that. It's the same as trying to force a boy who was born biologically female to act like a girl. Sure he's never going to have a functioning penis as a man, but forcing him to go through childhood as a girl is just going to fuck him up.

You actually don't realize that the kid in the video is the same kid in the Original Post?
The two videos were posted by the same exact uploader, I don't know how you could fuck it up.
I just noted that one of his videos is in fact called "I was born a boy".
Wow, now I can really see how in-attentive you can be, and you're seriously confused.
None of what you described is what has much to do with the kid in the video.
I mean sure yeah, one of the titles of his videos translates to "I was born a boy", but nothing that you had even said in this segment really applies to him, like at all.
Like this is the MtF kid that I've Originally Posted, up there on the top.
And you can tell that your very, confusing post isn't even the case.
I mean like, look at the people he's subscribed to.
This is the same person you've been referring to as "she".
He's straight up MtF.

In-attentive...

Look back at my post. This was the video I was referring to:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUTcwqR4Q4Y

Coming back to how you admit that your FtM example will never have a functioning penis, we should also be able to agree that she'll never have other aspects of a man, as well.
Besides, you're not really "forcing them to go through childhood as a girl" since well, they honestly weren't a boy to begin with. Anyways, it'll just end up being a phase for her.

He was a boy to begin with until his penis got burnt off in a botched circumcision. Then his parents forced him to grow up as a girl. Which it turned out was not his gender. And there were clear signs that his gender was male which his parents tried to supress. That fucked him up.

The girl in the OP who was born biologically male, also must have shown signs that her gender was female and her parents apparently didn't try to force her to act like a boy. That would have fucked her up if they had.

robomagon lähetti viestin:

No, it's just me being considerate of others and not telling them how to live their lives. The fact that the result of that happens to be the same goal that the media tries to push is mere coincidence. Reversing my opinion on an issue simply to make it contrary to theirs would only make me an idiot.

AKA, emotionally-driven feelings of wanting to respect Transgender people...

Respecting other people's chioces in life has nothing to de with "emotionally-driven feelings".

...while feeding in to the Politically Correctness at the same time, which would be reinforcing the narrative that has oftentimes pushed for Multiculturalism and the rest, including Transgenderism.

A does not lead to or have any connection with B.

I'm not telling people to live their lives inside of an arbitrary way I've contrived, but rather it is purely based on factual reasoning that they're not actually the opposite gender, at all.

Yes you are. You've arbitrarily decided that gender and sex are the same thing. You are factually wrong. The girl in the OP video is factually female gendered. Her sex is the only thing that's male.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sex
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gender
Please learn the factual meanings of the terms before trying to use them in a debate.

I totally love how you go on to say that "it's a pure coincidence", by the way.
You call that "being considerate of others", without being factually reasonable and actually giving in to and satisfying their own Mental illness? You have a sense of humor!

Coincidences happen all the time. It's not a sign of some huge conspiracy.

Again, it's not considered an illness. Do you have a doctorate in psychiatry? If so, you should probably write a paper to challenge the current medical consensus on the subject.

robomagon lähetti viestin:

Only biologically, but go on.

"Only biologically"
What in the Hell is that supposed to mean?
How else can it be possibly done?
Is there some "Otherkin" way I have to do it?

Again: Sex =/= gender. Educate yourself and learn the difference.

robomagon lähetti viestin:

I've said this multiple times but it seems to keep going in one ear and out the other with you. I'll try once more: I am not telling you or anyone else what to call them. Doing that would make me PC. I've only shown you how I refer to them. The fact that how I refer to them seems to offend you and that you seem to want to change it, means that you're acting quite PC yourself.

You actually haven't said that before, you haven't said that you're not telling me what to call these mentally ill Transgender people, instead you kept justifying Transgenderism.

Yes I have. Several times.

robomagon lähetti viestin:

I'm not saying that people should be called anything. That would be PC. I'm simply personally willing to call transgendered people by the personal pronouns of associated with their mental gender rather than their biological sex. Telling other people what words they have to use would be PC.

robomagon lähetti viestin:

I'm not saying that people should be called anything. That would be PC. I'm simply personally willing to call transgendered people by the personal pronouns of associated with their mental gender rather than their biological sex. Telling other people what words they have to use would be PC.

And it should have been inferred from these:

robomagon lähetti viestin:

On the subject of political correctness: You seem to have a problem with me referring to her as "she". You also seem to disapprove of political correctness, as do I. So I find it odd that you're acting very PC at the moment. You want others to refer to her as a "he", when it's our right to call her whatever we like. You're trying to correct the political views of others to match your own. To make them refer to things the way you see them rather than the way they see them. That's exactly what I hate about political correctness.

robomagon lähetti viestin:

She was born a he, you think she's still a he, and that everyone should call her a he. She most likely thinks she was born a she in a he body, and that she's a she now, and that she should be called a she.

Both of those are PC views. An actual anti-PC stance is not to try and fight every PC view with and equal and opposite PC view of your own, but to simply make up your own damn mind and allow for everyone else to do the same.

You're already enough of a PC cuckold, to top it all.
I've already explained that I'm going by facts, and you're led by emotions.

Except that you're not using the currently accepted scientific fact that sex and gender are not the same thing. And I am using that fact, and not emotion or personal bias.

What I've done was try and make corrections, for which I know what is true.
I don't even feel offended, and I just think you're a pseudo-intellectual moron who knows absolutely nothing about what he's trying to talk about, as I've usually thought before.
The part that disturbs me the most is how you've distorted the term "Politically Correct".

There's no such thing as "reverse racism" or "reverse sexism". There's just racism and sexism. It doesn't matter who's doing it to whom. It's the same with trying to politically correct someone. Doesn't matter who has what politics and what those politics are trying to be corrected to. It's still PC.

robomagon lähetti viestin:

What you're doing is denying the fact that gender and biological sex aren't the same thing.

Once again to play DA: Isn't Gender a Social Construct?

Meanwhile you have people who happen to be "Cis-gender".
These are the normal people who are "fine" with their gender / biological sex.
And then you have Transgenders, who are not mentally aligned with their biological sex.
I think the simple fact of the matter is, they're just mentally ill.

That's your opinion. Current medical science disagrees with that opinion, but you're free to hold it nonetheless.

Men who think that they're actually women.
Kind of like Otherkin shit, right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y1GbBhu9hA

Kind of, although I don't believe being human is a social construct. Nor do I believe in reincarnation. Or the soul.

robomagon lähetti viestin:

Defying the "narrative" just for its own sake just makes you a contrarian.

Wow shit, you're the biggest Contrarian I've seen.
It feels like I've received an accolade for this!
Except that the difference here is that I am upholding absolute fact.

This is getting repetitive. Your "absolute fact" is factually wrong.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sex
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gender

The only thing that can be done about it, is simply rejecting and denying facts.
Which is what Transgender people are doing, of course.

Rejection and denial are not synonymous. And they're not rejecting fact, they're rejecting their biological sex.

By universally agreed standards, you would be the one trying to deny and reject fact.

By universally agreed standards, you are the one trying to deny and reject accepted medical and lexical facts.

Henceforth, this makes you a Contrarian of Facts and Logic, trying to fight it with emotion.

Again: You are the one denying facts and logic. Wether due to personal bias or emotion I don't know.

There's no logical reason to refer to a MtF as a "woman".

Their gender is female and a female is generally referred to as a "woman".

Only that people do it for the sake of emotional appeal.

Different people do it for different reasons.

I mean like, you established your Atheistic beliefs BASED ON CONTRARIANISM.

What lead you to that conclusion?
FYI I came to be an atheist because a little more than word of mouth to believe in myths and fairy tales. Show me scientific proof that unicorns exist and I'll believe it.

robomagon lähetti viestin:

I resent the accusation that my opinion was reached due to emotion rather than rational logic.

Well, of course it was.
Your excuse is that you want to "respect" them and their pronouns.
If you were actually factually objective, then you'd share my thoughts.
I do regret that you don't, however.

My opinions have a factual basis. Yours do not.

robomagon lähetti viestin:

Like I said, they've very good at obfuscation and misleading their audience. You see, they never technically lied in that footage. They showed him and hid that he was black, likely because he was to most well armed and threatening looking which helped sell their agenda. And they only said that there were armed white men there, which I don't doubt that there were. They probably only had pistols and not an AR though so they showed the guy with the AR and conviently hid the fact that he was actually black. No outright lies, just clever manipulation of the facts to serve their agenda.

Their narrative is "Armed White Men with Guns who want to lynch the Black President".
Because of how inconvenient it would've to include a black man's whole body on video and try to implicate more than Angry Armed White People are there protesting, then that would definitely negate the narrative that they would've wanted to write, correct?
They have in fact tried to implicate things like Racial Overtones as a major theme.
That is the reason why they had to hide the fact that the AR guy was actually fact.

It's a little something called "media bias".

The only part I disagree with is the claim that they actually lied. I completely agree that they're extremely biased and manipulative. And that they cherry-pick the stories they cover.

robomagon lähetti viestin:

I did pay attention. The problem is that it has to be a vast conspiracy to work as described. He specifically made it a point that all those movements would carefully aviod bringing up points that could damage the school's plans and only focus on the ones that would further their goals. That's simply not possible without constant control. You can't just start huge movements like that and not have them evolve on their own in directions you didn't plan for without always having influence on their current leaders.

While I'm certain that when he referred to it as "not being a vast conspiracy", I'm pretty sure that it wasn't tinfoil-tier kind of stuff with some secret government shit involved.
However to an extent, they did have control somewhat; in perhaps a similar way as today.
This would include the filtering of peer-reviewed products that were or weren't approved.

I'm sure we could go on for pages and pages not even debating but just discussing this, but I really think it's outside the scope of the topic. Perhaps another time.

robomagon lähetti viestin:

The toxicity is a part of it, yes. It's just not worth the headache. I don't even like getting into these things too often on here. Multitasking on forums is a fun way to blow off steam, I don't want to bog it down with too much seriousness.

Wow great, so you stay away from a website due to its "toxicity". Got it.
That's actually really immature, and you're what... 34 years old?
You're only going to the site just for the porn and memes?
How much more of a manchild can you possibly get?
It's not even like that Steam is any better at all.
How bored do you get to find forums fun?
Essentially it's the same shit on 4chan.
Except that it's more exciting and less predictable.
Well, that generally depends on the channel you browse.
On Steam though, these fuckers can get personal and viscous too!

If I'm just going to be surrounded by assholes then no, it's not worth my time. And again, I don't get into politics that often.
I very rarely visit the site for anything. It's usually only due to a link. And it's almost always porn related as I don't really care about memes unless I happen to come across one that seems funny.
Manchild? Now who's feeding into the PC narrative?


I'm done here for today.

Fantaziya lähetti viestin:

from what I've seen, that robomagon guy

Does that mean you hate me or that you think I'm the most hated?

Either way: Yay, I got a vote. XD

Goldiecon99 lähetti viestin:

WarCanine?

have you played Rule of Rose??

do you remember what happened to Brown???

He became a ghost and helped a crazy woman fight a mass child-murdering man who had been trained by a teenage girl into acting like a dog until he finally killed himself?

That's a pretty obscure PS2 game to reference BTW. I remember wanting Jennifer and Wendy to just give in to their obvious sexual tension and start making out with each other that time Jennifer had her on the floor and was bitch slapping the shit out of her.