Oprindeligt skrevet af Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

Well here the mods understand what happened. But on a normal Steam forum...

Well, we are not in a normal Steam forum, are we?

No, we're not. But I was just making an observation that people who do that are jerks. Not saying that any such action would or should be taken here.

Oprindeligt skrevet af A Very Jolly Pyrofish:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

About what the non staff tells them to do. I never said they shouldn't think and make decisions for themselves.

Why shouldn't they care what the group wants?

Oprindeligt skrevet af Sir Illic:

Alright guys let's get back on topic

Sorry, party's over.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

Yep. Sigh... You can't even quote those people's names without risking a forum ban.

You worry too much.

Well here the mods understand what happened. But on a normal Steam forum...

Oprindeligt skrevet af Shadowcon66:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

OP needs NSFW tags...

Let me guess: Candy Glaze's e621 link?

Yep. Sigh... You can't even quote those people's names without risking a forum ban.

OP needs NSFW tags...

Oprindeligt skrevet af Sir Illic:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart:

The world would a much better place if the Empire was revived.

Which empire?

Just a wild guess: The British Empire.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Sir Illic:

Alright guys let's get back on topic:

I don't think Justin Bieber is that bad of a singer.

Sorry, just saw this. It's over.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Shadowcon66:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

From the personal experience of having interacted with and observed all three of them.

And how many groups were you in to "observe" me, Brigadier and Pyrofish?
The only groups you've ever been acquainted with us in, would be FF and FRC.
Those two groups are literally the only places we can all agree meeting you in...

Just those two, yes. I haven't seen too much of Pyrofish, but I've seen more than enough of you and Brig to judge your characters.

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

I don't get along with any of them mind you, but brig is the only one of the three I would respect.

Just because of the fact that you simply dislike us for disagreeing with you and whatnot, you're going to use that as a basis as to why we would not make decent moderators?
That's just pure bias at this point, it's a horrible characteristic to have as an admin.
You would just turn out to be an abusive Badmin if you ever got into any power!

No, that's actually the opposite of what I'm saying. Despite my disagreements with Brig, I still think he'd make a decent moderator. You, I don't. See below.

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

(Well, shadow too, but his talents are better served taking a group down rather than supporting it.)

How, exactly?

You've been underhanded, manipulative, and downright malicious since the day I met you. To be sure, you're good at it, thus the respect. But I hardly think you'd be a good candidate to help keep a group together rather than tear itself apart.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Shadowcon66:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

Feeble humans are incapable of perfection. You should know that only robots are capable of that.

Well technically uh, nah.
Robots are man-made.
We're more than robot.
Very materialistic view.

That was just directed at Russian Hacker/Robo Jesus.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Shadowcon66:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Sir Illic:

If it makes anyone feel better, I will make sure everyone looks at the poll if new staff are ever needed.

Thanks, any feedback from staffers is appreciated.

Well, so much for robomagon saying that they "shouldn't" care...

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

Experienced perhaps, but I don't know that I would call any of the current top picks decent.

Why, because I happen to be one of them?

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

Where have I falsely claimed the staff as having said something they didn't? In fact, where have I claimed that they said anything at all?

When you said that they shouldn't care about it.

How is me stating my opinion of how they should act in any way putting words into their mouths?

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

Didn't say that either.

And yet, doing nothing with it is the same exact thing as "not caring".

Not caring about someone else's opinion, is not caring about someone else's opinion. It does not follow that this leads to inaction.

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

About what the non staff tells them to do. I never said they shouldn't think and make decisions for themselves.

You did say that they shouldn't think about what others have to say, and rather decide to trust in whatever else is suggested or agreed upon by the moderators themselves.

I said care, not think.