Oprindeligt skrevet af gabrum01:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

He has a shield. Lets hope he raises it and deports all the refugees who snuck in with the borders down.

No, this would make the group die faster

Do you like the current state of the group?

Oprindeligt skrevet af gabrum01:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Sir Illic:

The Krinkov Presidency is coming.

Good or bad?

Krinkov is a good guy

He has a shield. Lets hope he raises it and deports all the refugees who snuck in with the borders down.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Geech:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

Well, every argument you've tried to make to support your position has actually done nothing but undermine it. I think that's a fairly good example of stupid.

>Took him this long to use ad hominem instead of figuring out the definition of stupid.

No, John, YOU are the demons.

So you're allowed to use ad homs almost constantly, but when I make one that's actually based on your actions witnissed within the argument itself, then it's not OK?

Although I was wrong. I didn't give an example of "stupid". Repeating the same action over and over but expecting a different outcome as you seem to be doing is actually the definition of insanity, not stupidity.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Geech:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

Thus admitting that 5th graders have sex. Then you called them 3rd graders, implying that 3rd graders have sex. And by calling them stupid you only reinforce the need to teach them sex ed so they do it properly.

You.. don't know the definition of stupid, do you?

Well, every argument you've tried to make to support your position has actually done nothing but undermine it. I think that's a fairly good example of stupid.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Geech:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

You're the one who said 3rd graders were having sex...

Do you not have reading comprehension?

I said that the only 5th graders who would ever have sex are the ones that are so stupid and ill educated that they're in inner city schools.

Thus admitting that 5th graders have sex. Then you called them 3rd graders, implying that 3rd graders have sex. And by calling them stupid you only reinforce the need to teach them sex ed so they do it properly.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Geech:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

You're the one who forgot what you were arguing about and lowered the age group you were trying to raise...

You should not teach sexual education to young children who can't even grasp that cooties are fake.

You are at the age where you cannot grasp that cooties are fake, Robo, I will not talk to you about the birds and the bees, shut up and sit down.

You're the one who said 3rd graders were having sex...

Oprindeligt skrevet af Amsel :D:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

The difference between this and the survey is that this has a "no" option.

I think the fact that the first thing to happen in this thread was questioning the need of it sort of jeopordized the entire survey. I don't know why I included a "no" option actually, petitions are just sign or don't sign. Should probably delet this

Just about every real petition in this group has had a no option. It helps to make sure that when more people don't want something than do, that it doesn't pass.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Geech:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

Alright. So 3rd graders are having sex now. So start teaching sex ed in 3rd grade.

You're fucking retarded, Robo, stop.

You're the one who forgot what you were arguing about and lowered the age group you were trying to raise...

The awards were stupid so I didn't put much thought into them and just voted for the badge.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Geech:

Oprindeligt skrevet af robomagon:

Except that they're in the 5th grade and are factually "5th graders"...

They don't count as 5th graders because their schools are shit and inner city 5th graders are considered 3rd graders.

Alright. So 3rd graders are having sex now. So start teaching sex ed in 3rd grade.