Originally posted by Stake from Jate Farm:

My porn-watching habits.

into the gayer stuff now are you you hot bitch

Originally posted by Kptn Howdy:

Originally posted by Erick:

Well, you don't even know half the maps from either Doom 1 or Doom 2.

And when I say know, I say KNOW the maps themselves.

I'm not gonna pretend to say I know the maps from Doom 1 or 2 or try to tell people what modes they have though, aren't I?

i don't pretend i have done mostly my research on the basis of scientific fact suck as that life is made up of cells

Originally posted by gabrum01:

Originally posted by Burnt Sienna:

I STILL DONBT UNDERSTAND ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE BUDDHIST BELIEF OR THE SINGER

YOU DIRTY WHORE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vabnZ9-ex7o


this nirvana

that clears things up your fucking hooker

Originally posted by gabrum01:

Originally posted by Burnt Sienna:

the buddhist belief or the singer you need to specify with things like these you dirty whore

It is not only nirvana, nirvana is cool, i like rock in general

I STILL DONBT UNDERSTAND ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE BUDDHIST BELIEF OR THE SINGER

YOU DIRTY WHORE

Originally posted by gabrum01:

That i like nirvana

the buddhist belief or the singer you need to specify with things like these you dirty whore

Originally posted by Reality:

You are supposed to lose more from losing than you win from winning (except on very new accounts) that is simply how these systems function. You would see the same on smogon, starcraft, dota, or chess. They don't use a strict elo system[en.wikipedia.org] but their variation of it stil applies this to any account that is considered to be stable. I think blizzard's wonky calibration is due to what happened in early starcraft 2. I do think it's arbitariness does help cut down alting...

So falling that many points due to those matches, even against a series of high rank opponets, is correct on the systems part.

Supports/Tanks versus damage. I think these are still misunderstood by developers, but for games that encourage team queues the importance of traditional objective/kill metrics is easier to implement. I think that weighting them is only great when solo queues are an active point of interest. After all med kit contention is a bit touchy to measure and destroys use of a blanket healing formula.

As for the matchmaking- In that case you are justified. The ladder system is extremely hostile to solo queues. Personally, I feel like you can mitigate the problems by joing a team yourself? I understand reluctance if you haven't done it before, but it doesn't really doesn't demand a much more difficult commitment than solo play.

In any case tournaments are a better competetive venue than ladders.. they encourage surprising opponet's instead of formulaic play, and usually downplay the importance of assuming oppnets strictly use meta rollouts. Of course ladders are nice in that they provide an immediate access to matches, but. as you say, it isn't really that competetive if not used "abusively" since communication is so important.

you sound fun at parties

Originally posted by DuckScout:

Originally posted by Burnt Sienna:

if you're that into me just talk to me like a real human being

Dude the fucks wrong with you? A girl just responded to him in a way that makes him feel insecure. Stfu.

if he feels insecure dont worry many mens feel insecure if it is that bad he can just wear some tighter underwear or maybe even a jockstrap

Originally posted by gabrum01:

Originally posted by Kɾყȥყɯҽҽɳ~:

How is that a hobby interest.

it is a interst,not a hobby

but it isn't a hobby interest which is the point of the thread

Originally posted by gabrum01:

about the girl i like

i'ts me isn't it

Originally posted by DuckScout:

Originally posted by Kptn Howdy:

masturbating :^)

That's an athletic sport

if you count that form of molestation not a crime