Originally posted by Sir Illic the Knightmare Knight:

Originally posted by robomagon:

Well you start with the extreme cases first, then the fear sets in on the others and they either confort to the norm as defined by the state or they too get indoctrinated/treated.

I might just be an idiot, but I don't really see anything wrong with that. The lack of violence seems to outweigh the loss of freedom.

Have fun with your totalitarian utopia.

Originally posted by Sir Illic the Knightmare Knight:

Originally posted by robomagon:

But again, only you start taking away people's right to refuse treatment, then where does it stop? Will teachers decide what meds our children will be required to take without their or their parents consent? Are aggressive people required to take downers? How long until political dissidents are required to be drugged out of their minds?

It stops when we get to a point where people don't get the urge to hurt or traumatise kids.

And what about those aggressive people and children? Eventually they might accidentally hurt people in their anger too. Let's drug those people against their will, too.

Originally posted by dino_inc:

Originally posted by Sir Illic the Knightmare Knight:

Well, from what I heard a prison sentence is practically a death penalty for pedos.

Even evil has standards.[tvtropes.org]

That's for entertainment purposes... not necessarily indicative of real life.

Sure it is . . . are you in for selling marijuana to your cousin or for touching little kids? I know which one I would prison rape first.

Originally posted by ᔕᑭOO᙭ᖇᙀᔕ ᔕᙅ᙭ᐯᖇY:

But...
It wouldn't be rape then...

Sure it would. If someone asks you to rape them, and then a week later you do, is it not rape?

if they asked for it

Originally posted by Just A Magic Spoop:

Originally posted by Burnt Sienna:

Devil's Advocate is playing the part of an opposing believer, despite you not holding that belief. For fun and to more understand why people may hold that viewpoint.

Oh.
Guys, Hitler did nothing wrong

Agreed.

Originally posted by Just A Magic Spoop:

Originally posted by Shadowcon66:

It wouldn't have because people were basing their arguments is that one video has used
"text-to-speech" and is making arguments about the Holocaust.

Even after making the Devil's Advocacy proclamation, it wouldn't have done anything for the derailing of the thread over a video that had used a text-to-speech voice.

Originally posted by dino_inc:

That thread was a mess, you should have just outright stated you were playing devil's advocate. It probably would have gone more smoothly.

I've asked this question and I will again.
What
the
fuck
is
a
Devil's
Advocate

Devil's Advocate is playing the part of an opposing believer, despite you not holding that belief. For fun and to more understand why people may hold that viewpoint.

Originally posted by gabrum01:

you are one of the most normal guys in this group IMO...

You know what else is normal?

You sound like someone who fucks dogs and pretends he doesnt

Is there a word for underage people with a fetish for pedophilia