Ursprungligen skrivet av Shadowcon66:

Ursprungligen skrivet av ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:

Derailing flamewars
If flamewars aren't allowed in the first place, who's going to extinguish them

He didn't fucking partake in "derailing" the flamewar, he was involved in it.
Erick helped derail the thread with being involved in the flamewar
Otherwise he would've locked it himself before it was too late.

I only added him and told him to lock it because really the whole flamewar was over pyrofish and I've had enough of that shit, and I'm sure everyone here is too, majority wins really, considering the votes on both adding her in and modding her,

I wouldn't really blame him for getting in the arguement, he was dropping constructive criticism on the subject anyway oops

Ursprungligen skrivet av Pigeonbee:

Ursprungligen skrivet av ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:

not really, it says clearly in the rules:

2. Do not flamebait or actively start flame wars.

that's what most of the thread comments were about
"drama is what makes this group alive"
"flamewars arent allowed tho"


eh???

He helped derail it.
This is not moderator behaviour.

Derailing flamewars
If flamewars aren't allowed in the first place, who's going to extinguish them

it's almost as if you just want to make a part two of the last thread to keep the drama going or you just got pissed at Erick for stopping it

not really, it says clearly in the rules:

2. Do not flamebait or actively start flame wars.

that's what most of the thread comments were about
"drama is what makes this group alive"
"flamewars arent allowed tho"


eh???

Ursprungligen skrivet av Pigeonbee:

"she big dumb meanie who made soilder is op thread"
"she big dumb meanie for linking me to wiki"

I never took part in that tho

Ursprungligen skrivet av Pigeonbee:

Ursprungligen skrivet av ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:

A lot of people were against getting Pyrofish in the first place
So I'd assume they either put the rules there as a compromise or they wanted to be cautious with Pyrofish being around due to her "aggressiveness"

Mianly because of a couple of wishy-washy second-hand accounts

What do Second-Hand accounts have to do with this

Ursprungligen skrivet av Shadowcon66:

Ursprungligen skrivet av ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:

Meh, not like you're any better

Nobody is, and especially not any better than Pyrofish. This is the point we're trying to make.
Everyone is a shitty person, but people have convinced themselves via circlejerking that they can't do anything wrong at all; and that it's always okay to bait Pyro cuz since it's "her fault".

Pyrofish wasn't liked because of how much hate she brought and how much people hated her for it

Really it isn't about circlejerking

Ursprungligen skrivet av フハイ:

Ursprungligen skrivet av ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:

none of the people you listed are banned, too

Yeah, so why is Pyrofish banned?
What was the point of "specil conditions"?

A lot of people were against getting Pyrofish in the first place
So I'd assume they either put the rules there as a compromise or they wanted to be cautious with Pyrofish being around due to her "aggressiveness"

Ursprungligen skrivet av フハイ:

Ursprungligen skrivet av ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:

Meh, not like you're any better

Yeah, I'm not banned, too

none of the people you listed are banned, too

Ursprungligen skrivet av フハイ:

Ursprungligen skrivet av ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:

fyi G_lad just hates you but not really everyone in general

Doesn't really matter, it's me saying it, so anyone who looks agressive is agressive.

Meh, not like you're any better