THERE'S SO FUCKING MANY OF THEM. THEY'RE EVERYWHERE.

HELP.

Cancer.

Originally posted by Lé Kaiayos:

Originally posted by The Space Butterfly (Salt Lord):

The top 1% pay 24.7% of their income tax. People making an average of $75,000 pay 19.7%. That hardly seems like a lot.

Ever heard of a tax return?
The top 1% aren't getting theirs back.

I'd like some data on this, please.

Originally posted by FloomRide:

Originally posted by The Space Butterfly (Salt Lord):

Drumpf

triggered

Originally posted by The Space Butterfly (Salt Lord):

Unclear? Hardly.

I mean she's overly secretive and shady in general (refusing to release medical records, for example). The email scandal is also pretty bad for her record.

There's also the fact that she was put in place very undemocratically, with the primaries being rigged against Bernie from the start, which really puts me off.


then again, I can't vote, so whatever

Sure, the primaries were very much in her favor, especially with the media. But how much they were in her favor has been blown out of proportions. She beat Senator Sanders in the popular vote by around 3,000,000; only around a few thousand of those were rigged in her favor.

And of course the primaries would be rigged against Sanders. He's an outsider, a "filthy socialist here to create a new Soviet Union," as a Youtube comment oh-so eloquently put, speaking out against capitalism and calling for change (even though he is basically FDR 2.0). Many people wouldn't be comfortable with that.

I have spoken to many old people who support Clinton, and many say the same: though they respect Senator Sanders, they simply have to go with something comfortable, something they know, not something new and flashy. I could go on about this, but I won't.

The DNC's bias against him has been blown up as well. Yes, they were biased towards Clinton and against Sanders, and yes, Schultz is a piece of shit, but they only did so much. Pretty much all of the bias was just some people bouncing some anti-Sanders ideas around, particularily ideas pertaining to his religion, which is a disgustingly low blow, but none of these actions took place.

Clinton won, fair and square. I may not like it, others may not like it, but it is how it is.

Originally posted by Lé Kaiayos:

Originally posted by The Space Butterfly (Salt Lord):

But that does not mean we should just stand by and let them. Steps should be taken to at least reduce tax evasion from the wealthy. They're allowed far too much free reign, and should be checked.

You'd be surprised how much tax wealthy people pay.

The top 1% pay 24.7% of their income tax. People making an average of $75,000 pay 19.7%. That hardly seems like a lot.

Originally posted by FloomRide:

Originally posted by The Space Butterfly (Salt Lord):

Good. Trickle-down economics is horrible and just plain insulting.

I don't think he was advocating for trickle-down, I think he means that wealthy people will find a way to dodge taxes anyway, like they already do

But that does not mean we should just stand by and let them. Steps should be taken to at least reduce tax evasion from the wealthy. They're allowed far too much free reign, and should be checked.

Originally posted by Lé Kaiayos:

Originally posted by FloomRide:

both of them have terrible plans, it's just that HIllary has been so unclear about her plans that they could turn out worse than they already are

She wants to highly raise taxes for the wealthy.

Good. Trickle-down economics is horrible and just plain insulting.

Originally posted by FloomRide:

Originally posted by Lé Kaiayos:

Or the fact that she has terrible plans.

both of them have terrible plans, it's just that HIllary has been so unclear about her plans that they could turn out worse than they already are

Unclear? Hardly. Drumpf is the unclear one, constantly flip-flopping more than a fish on dry land.

Hillary.
Inb4paidshillaccusation

http://imgur.com/VG95vEa