Originally posted by DED (ft. shit wifi):

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

Like this is a special kind of stupid.

I AM A TIME TRAVELER! I PREDICTED THE ANGRY CHRISTAN!

>disagreeing means I'm christian
I really hope you're "merely" pretending.

I'm the best.

Originally posted by Bad Allergies:

Originally posted by Duckscout:

"PIC OR YOU'RE LYING"

http://imgur.com/a/JjAVq
[nsfw]
Also it's pics or wrong you dumbo nignog

>having my ass saved

>no CP posted
>b-but CP!!
None of the videos actually are CP you stupid fucks

Fuck off.

Who gives a fuck. Why do we need to pick sides.

Originally posted by DED (ft. shit wifi):

If god is real so is jesus.


If god isn't so is jesus.

INB4 Angry cristans

Like this is a special kind of stupid.

>thread for controversial opinions
>almost all aren't
Fuck off.

Originally posted by Merry Festivexrus XV:

Now, one more derail post here or another thread that is not related to this thread or is about the two locked threads that is also in a thread that does not have the two locked threads as the main topic and you are banned.

Go ahead. I'd rather not be here if you're just going to lock shit for no reason, then ban people who dare to question it. Fucking pathetic. Why would you even have a group if people aren't allowed to talk?
>oh but they are they just have to stay on topic
Yet you locked a thread that was completely on topic.

And, somehow, you don't know how conversations work. They go off the starting topic. It's basic fucking shit. If you went and spoke to people and didn't sit here jerking off "oh better lock this thread they said one post I don't want to think was on topic"
Go ahead, say "ya well I do outside so HA." You don't have any social experience if you think conversations should and do stay on the starting topic.

Originally posted by Merry Festivexrus XV:

Yes, they should reply yes and no answers relating to the topic. But you see, they went for literally way two long. One of those threads had 2-3 pages filled with people replying with shitposts to each other in argument that was basically a shitpost which literally took the focus of the thread to one filled with shitposts that went for 2-3 pages straight, in which would have blocked the view the answers of other people posting yes or no and driving the purpose of the thead to that of shitposts that aren't even trying to directly be related to the thread.

>2-3 pages
Sub 50 pleb.

Stop saying literally so much. Learn some fucking english.

So if one or two people shitpost, even if other people are having actual conversations, the thread is ruined? Lock damn near every thread then. Delete the group to prevent more.

in which would have blocked the view the answers of other people posting yes or no and driving the purpose of the thead to that of shitposts that aren't even trying to directly be related to the thread.

Completely untrue. Amazingly, posts don't overlap. So you can still completely read it. Just like how I can completely read G_Lad's post even though I'm daring to question your judgement in completely seperate posts.

inb4 delete

Originally posted by Merry Festivexrus XV:

Now, one more derail post here or another thread that is not related to this thread or is about the two locked threads that is also in a thread that does not have the two locked threads as the main topic and you are banned.

Go ahead. I'd rather not be here if you're just going to lock shit for no reason, then ban people who dare to question it. Fucking pathetic. Why would you even have a group if people aren't allowed to talk?
>oh but they are they just have to stay on topic
Yet you locked a thread that was completely on topic.

And, somehow, you don't know how conversations work. They go off the starting topic. It's basic fucking shit. If you went and spoke to people and didn't sit here jerking off "oh better lock this thread they said one post I don't want to think was on topic"
Go ahead, say "ya well I do outside so HA." You don't have any social experience if you think conversations should and do stay on the starting topic.

Originally posted by Merry Festivexrus XV:

Yes, they should reply yes and no answers relating to the topic. But you see, they went for literally way two long. One of those threads had 2-3 pages filled with people replying with shitposts to each other in argument that was basically a shitpost which literally took the focus of the thread to one filled with shitposts that went for 2-3 pages straight, in which would have blocked the view the answers of other people posting yes or no and driving the purpose of the thead to that of shitposts that aren't even trying to directly be related to the thread.

>2-3 pages
Sub 50 pleb.

Stop saying literally so much. Learn some fucking english.

So if one or two people shitpost, even if other people are having actual conversations, the thread is ruined? Lock damn near every thread then. Delete the group to prevent more.

in which would have blocked the view the answers of other people posting yes or no and driving the purpose of the thead to that of shitposts that aren't even trying to directly be related to the thread.

Completely untrue. Amazingly, posts don't overlap. So you can still completely read it. Just like how I can completely read G_Lad's post even though I'm daring to question your judgement in completely seperate posts.

Originally posted by Merry Festivexrus XV:

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

Oh, Evo better lock this thread, already derailed. :^)

Well now you are the one derailing this. Post one or two more times with posts like this to intentionally derail and flame the thread and you getting a ban. This is a warning.

How isn't this a derail? You said the other threads should only have yes or no answers. Should threads like this not only have answers that go with what the OP want?

If you're upset to discuss it, feel free to make another thread, so you can't abuse your powers and ban me for discussion.