Originally posted by Santanic Anyar FRC:

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

I'd like to find something decent in it, thanks.

kek

also,

quote:
"OwO what's this" is the joke posts subforum, different rules, different purpose
Which the original thread, which was locked, was in. I was trying to reply, but he locked the thread for no reason.
I'll make another post, for it, since i want to post this one before it's locked.

sorry, didn't realize that
why was a thread in the Joke Posts section locked?

wait no derail

uh

I'm trying to explain it, but he's deleting every thread i made in GD, and locking all the ones I make in alt.

Complete abuse. Have him screenshot the first 3 pages of GD, if you don't believe me.

So, when will he be putting a leash on his mods?

Originally posted by Santanic Anyar FRC:

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

Why I'm much smarter and a good leader, yes.

>implies being slightly jewish makes you smarter and have better leadership skills
no

I'd like to find something decent in it, thanks.

Originally posted by Santanic Anyar FRC:

"no reason"
read ludek's post

It being pointless, in his point of view, is not against the rules.

"breaking no rules"
how about "spamming"

So I have to be silent while he abuses his power?
I'm able to remake my thread if it's being unfairly locked, as there was no reason for it to be locked.

"OwO what's this" is the joke posts subforum, different rules, different purpose

Which the original thread, which was locked, was in. I was trying to reply, but he locked the thread for no reason.
I'll make another post, for it, since i want to post this one before it's locked.

You thinking a thread is pointless is not a valid reason to lock it. There is no rule saying they have to fit what you think is valid.

You're doing exactly what I said in the OP.

I honestly can't tell anymore. What I can see is that this thread is insignificant, the issue is practically nonexistent.

Why would you lock it? It's not against the rules. Nice admin abuse.

"Lmao, let's all circlejerk about dogfucker again by reinforcing how BAD bestiality is (basically zoophilia)"

Everytime that comes up, the user in question and the circlejerkers get into bad blood, and we get reports from the thread. I honestly would like the issue to die.

>instead of banning or removing the person who's actually doing something wrong, they'll lock threads and ban people who point out it's wrong
Are you fucking stupid

In any case, you're getting worked up over a single thread.

He wasn't though. The only one getting slightly upset was you.

Or you're trying to aggravate me so I can stroke your ego.

He's too much of a fucking faggot for that. Trust me.

I honestly can't tell anymore. What I can see is that this thread is insignificant, the issue is practically nonexistent.

Why would you lock it? It's not against the rules. Nice admin abuse.

If your thread had actual, legitimate stuff to discuss, why not explain so in your description - it's there for a reason. Why not repost the topic with a clearer meaning?

>threads have to fit my specific guidelines to be valid
>hasn't even written them anywhere
Fuck off

Originally posted by Amsel :D:

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

I've said several times I am slightly jewish.

Explains a lot.

Why I'm much smarter and a good leader, yes.

Originally posted by Just A Magic Bagel:

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

I've said several times I am slightly jewish.

Hey Hitler, you missed a spot.

He did, and I wish he didn't.

I don't understand why people don't believe me when they find out I'm jewish after knowing I think hitler was right, happens more often than it should.

Originally posted by robomagon:

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

I've said several times I am slightly jewish.

>quote him many times calling him panda
>no one catches on
You lot are fucking pathetic.

Users call you a man all the time. Does that make it true?

But that's different. One's fact, one's a nickname. I call him panda, and no one catches on me calling him panda means he's panda

Originally posted by Amsel :D:

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

>stormnigger picking the wrong side
this is a pattern

>literally admitting to be the Jewish side

I've said several times I am slightly jewish.

Originally posted by Santanic Anyar FRC:

Originally posted by Sir Illic:

Wait, this Panda bloke I keep hearing about is Awew?

Wait, what?

>quote him many times calling him panda
>no one catches on
You lot are fucking pathetic.

"Lmao, let's all circlejerk about dogfucker again by reinforcing how BAD bestiality is (basically zoophilia)"

Everytime that comes up, the user in question and the circlejerkers get into bad blood, and we get reports from the thread. I honestly would like the issue to die.

>instead of banning or removing the person who's actually doing something wrong, they'll lock threads and ban people who point out it's wrong
Are you fucking stupid

In any case, you're getting worked up over a single thread.

He wasn't though. The only one getting slightly upset was you.

Or you're trying to aggravate me so I can stroke your ego.

He's too much of a fucking faggot for that. Trust me.

I honestly can't tell anymore. What I can see is that this thread is insignificant, the issue is practically nonexistent.

Why would you lock it? It's not against the rules. Nice admin abuse.

If your thread had actual, legitimate stuff to discuss, why not explain so in your description - it's there for a reason. Why not repost the topic with a clearer meaning?

>threads have to fit my specific guidelines to be valid
>hasn't even written them anywhere
Fuck off

Originally posted by Amsel :D:

Originally posted by robomagon:

Pyrofish vs Shadowcon:

Choose Your Side!

Shadowcon Master Race

>stormnigger picking the wrong side
this is a pattern