Originally posted by Jake:

Originally posted by Corneye:

Because someone important voted yes, means we should all vote yes?
Do you realise how retarded that sounds?

Who said i meant that?
i meant the staff themselves want her to go. because she's a bigotted cunt.

>who said i meant that?
>makes exact same point again

Are you autistic?

Originally posted by Pyrofish:

So should I contact the steam moderation or is this going to be locked?

Contact Steam Moderation, please.

Originally posted by Littlefoot:

Originally posted by Corneye:

She posts constructivly, and she is involved in derails, because retards like you keep sperging out and cause drama, and flamebait her.

That's a big sack of bullshit. She has repeatedly attempted to start shit several times for no reason other than "the lels".

>start shit
Oh, wait, you're an autist, you can't tell when people are joking, sorry.

Originally posted by Jake:

Originally posted by Lewin FRC:

Tbh a good number of these people came from Forum Filth, so they technically have a group to go to

But I agree. Banning Pyrofish won't do much unless there is a legitimate reason, since she's kind of embedded herself into the community, and a bunch of people have gotten used to her "way of speaking".

There is alot of legitimate reasons.
Heck, even krinkov and evo signed in.

Because someone important voted yes, means we should all vote yes?
Do you realise how retarded that sounds?

Originally posted by Jake:

Originally posted by Corneye:

Even though I dislike you after the "incident" involving dogfucker, you have a fair point.
What's banning Pyrofish going to achieve?
You'll either cause drama or get very unhappy members, who will eventually split away, make their own group, and kill you lot off.

Barely even.
We all want constructive posts and no derails.

She posts constructivly, and she is involved in derails, because retards like you keep sperging out and cause drama, and flamebait her.

Originally posted by Prusak:

No.
Just because petitions are shit and solve nothing, only working to split the group in half

Even though I dislike you after the "incident" involving dogfucker, you have a fair point.
What's banning Pyrofish going to achieve?
You'll either cause drama or get very unhappy members, who will eventually split away, make their own group, and kill you lot off.

Originally posted by Jake:

Originally posted by Duckscout:

I kinda feel like this group wouldn't be the same without pyrofish.

Yeah good luck trying to find a non-derailrd thread when pyrofish's here.

Okay.
I can find several.

Originally posted by Jake:

14-9
ban when

Considering the drama that will happen after, and the bullshitty nature of the accusations, then never.

Originally posted by Jake:

Originally posted by Corneye:

L-lock thread

Get busted. (^;

shit

Originally posted by DED:

Originally posted by Corneye:

lock thread

I talked about this to krinkov, he wants to wait a few days to see if there are more yess or nos by then.

L-lock thread