Originally posted by Geech:

Originally posted by λdvi☭:

No, furry pornographic content in general.

I'd say that's relatively different because the subject of the porn is still... humanoid.

You can't say that the focus of the fetish is on the humanoid shape, because without the animal part it would defeat the whole purpose of that said fetish by turning it into regular porn.

Originally posted by Geech:

Originally posted by λdvi☭:

Borderline in general. Actually, the "border" is crossed quite often.

Are you referring to Feral porn?

That's usually two animals going at it IIRC.

No, furry pornographic content in general.

Originally posted by Shadowcon66:

Originally posted by λdvi☭:

I think the "furry" fetish is borderline zoophilia and that conventions about that fetish should be prohibited.

People call me out for being a bully.

>borderline

Borderline in general. Actually, the "border" is crossed quite often.

I think the "furry" fetish is borderline zoophilia and that conventions about that fetish should be prohibited.

People call me out for being a bully.

Originally posted by FestiveAether:

I think Advi would be a great mod.

Yes.

Do someone know who this "new mod" is ?

I mean, its profile at least.

Originally posted by 3dge23dge:

Originally posted by gabrum01 REGULARS VULT:

We made a group

Enter if you want

If you're going to raid, please have the sense to hide all connections to this group at the least.

What is this nonsense anyway ? I'm fully behind this new mod.

Great job.

Originally posted by DED:

Originally posted by Sir Illic:

No, raiding isn't allowed.

We need to mass report this new mod so he can get fired off he's shitty job

I'm getting mixed signals here, first people complain that mods are too absent, and now that they are doing their job, you hate them for it ?

Did i missed something ?

Originally posted by Bookwormdalek:

Originally posted by λdvi☭:

How can you say it isn't ?

Because to say it will be acheivable would be a guess based on absolutely nothing whereas to say it won't be acheivable is based on the knowledge of the complexity of the human brain compared to any computer technology and the difficulty in having a computer both know and experience things.

The burden of proof is on you.

Well, science is about breaking established rules.

You say that achieving true A.I is impossible based on facts that aren't concrete, our understanding of the human brain and our mastery in technology is something that constantly evolve, i didn't said that A.I are for tommorow at least complexe one, in facts, we already have basic A.I, limited, but limited like the first PC where.

If it do ever happen, we will not be there to see it happen anyway.

Originally posted by Bookwormdalek:

Originally posted by λdvi☭:

I never said we can achieve it right now, but it's just a matter of decades.

But how can you say such a thing is even acheivable?

How can you say it isn't ?