Originally posted by Blingie:

Originally posted by Bookwormdalek:

Yes I remember when Trump decided to invade Libya, leading to the collapse of the region and the death of Gadaffi after he was raped with a bayonet. I then remember when Trump laughed about it during an interview and got four Americans killed in Benghazi because of the collapse and subsequent urging of the Arab Spring.

Trump was for the invasion of Libya though.
Hillary took responsibility of the four americans killed. If Trump was in that position, I highly doubt he'd take responsibility if what Hillary claimed to be true; that she was never notified of the dilemma.

Blaming one side for everything doesn't automatically make your preferred candidate a saint. They're one in the same afaik. At least she takes the right steps to take responsibility.

Big fucking differences.

1. Hillary had intel that Trump and the rest of the American people didn't.

2. Trump went on record as being incredibly concerned about the allegiances of the coalitions we were backing when the attacks began. Hillary doesn't seem to have expressed the same concerns.

3. I don't recall Trump laughing about Gadaffi's death or trying to coverup that he fucked up in Benghazi and got four Americans killed by claiming it was all just because of some whacky video.

Originally posted by Blingie:

Originally posted by Bookwormdalek:

You'd rather keep the one with a track record of war than the one with a track record of some mean Tweets at odd hours?

Typical american: Blame one side for everything but completely ignore the same aspects the candidate you affiliate with has committed

Yes I remember when Trump decided to invade Libya, leading to the collapse of the region and the death of Gadaffi after he was raped with a bayonet. I then remember when Trump laughed about it during an interview and got four Americans killed in Benghazi because of the collapse and subsequent urging of the Arab Spring.

Originally posted by Fork_Q2:

Originally posted by Bookwormdalek:

Hillary's a sociopath.

Rather keep the one that knows better than to blow up on Twitter and blame everyone else in public though.

You'd rather keep the one with a track record of war than the one with a track record of some mean Tweets at odd hours?

Originally posted by Fork_Q2:

Originally posted by robomagon:

Trump is a businessman, so he wouldn't do it. Hillary though...

Trump's a psycho though.

Hillary's a sociopath.

Nope, medical condition

Originally posted by dino_inc:

Originally posted by Bookwormdalek:

Are you sure it's a taser and not a gun?

It's a gun. (And also, what's with that question wording?)

What? There's nothing off with the wording at all.

Originally posted by dino_inc:

Originally posted by Bookwormdalek:

The fuck are you talking about? School cops don't carry fucking guns here.

Yes they do, the cop at my school carries one.

Are you sure it's a taser and not a gun?

Originally posted by robomagon:

Originally posted by ᔕᑭOO᙭ᖇᙀᔕ ᔕᙅ᙭ᐯᖇY:

I guess.
What if said pedophile discovered his urge after evalutation but yuo all know?
Would you all still let your children roam near him/her so calmly?

I can't imagine the school not taking almost immediate action upon finding out. And what with all the armed cops at US public schools these days I don't imagine there would be much rish during the very brief window of time before that teacher gets put on probation while the matter is looked into.

The fuck are you talking about? School cops don't carry fucking guns here.

FRC attacks holocaust deniers and supports bestiality.

Really makes me think.

He's community banned though