Originally posted by Raymond FRC:

I can't be the only one...

EDIT: Hit my post limit again. **** this.

@Alpha Compa, yeah, I've heard, but I don't know how to use the Ethernet cable.
And before anyone tries to teach me, it's a lost cause.

@Littlefoot I usually have low ping, but my wifi is highly unstable. For example, I may be playing just fine with 80 ping, then suddenly I'll be stuck in one place with the red text threatening to disconnect me. It passes after 20 seconds, but my ping is 334.

What kind of wifi are you playing with? Is it a wireless device that's stand alone?What I mean is there's some devices that act as both your router and your satellite dish so to speak. And they're the equalivent of satellite internet, which is always unstable.

Originally posted by Dapper Cadaver:

Originally posted by Dr. Raven:

Depends on who you are playing against. Very viable strategy in ctf servers for one since people will be afraid of your sentry unless they're an engie counter. Most will think it's still there while you destroy it and start rebuilding. And ctf is so camp-ish due to teams being split to either attack or defense, they never focus into all attack usually.

Unless it's 2fort, you build a lv3 at lts planned spot in 5 seconds: right outside spawn

Still I(most people)will destroy a lv2-3 for a few crit off a 3 clip shotgun, it's not op what so ever cause of its tiny clipsize, you won't be able to be agressive with 3 crits

Diamondback on the other hand, makes you the best flag carrier if you have crits for no one can stop you

Spy is still fairly brittle and the damage isn't enough to deter people from avoiding him. He'll likely die before he can get two successful diamondback shots against competent players. Crit shotguns on the other hand nuke just about anything and that'll deter anyone from wanting to get close to him, even with only 3 shots. You can one shot enemy scouts/spies/snipers at a medium range, while successfully two shotting others.


Both are relatively good weapons, against bad players. I'm more afraid of a fj engie who can aim than a spy, it's a lot more easier to stop spy from doing his job to get the crits. You can't stop your allies from feeding him backstabs but you can often make him pay for it, on the other hand if you take down the enemy sentry you're just asking to be nuked by crits while low on ammo.

Originally posted by Dapper Cadaver:

And, fj can only use with mini sentries, because nobody in the right mind would destroy a lv3 for a few crits from a weapon with -50% clipsize

Depends on who you are playing against. Very viable strategy in ctf servers for one since people will be afraid of your sentry unless they're an engie counter. Most will think it's still there while you destroy it and start rebuilding. And ctf is so camp-ish due to teams being split to either attack or defense, they never focus into all attack usually.

Originally posted by Dapper Cadaver:

Originally posted by Radiant Malevolence:

Engie's Frontier Justice.

He was not weak on face to face battle, he have a bloody shotgun, and frontier justice only give crit off sentry kills, that means you must have sentry destroyed to get the crit, and it have 50% clip penalty
If diamondback only have 3 shots trust me I would turn back to saying it's up

still it's a shotgun with crits, not a pistol with crits. A crit shotgun can do what again, like 270 or something like that. If you're fighting bad players the frontier is still a straight upgrade because they'll feed crit after crit. I've gotten up to 40 on my person at one given point.

Diamondback is the spy's eyelander, ubersaw, or his airstrike as you might call it. These weapons have slight/huge downsides. Weapons that were designed to be pointless against players around your skill level, that feed off bad ones and reward you for doing so, punishing the entire enemy team for one of their players being bad. They're pubstomping weapons for the most part.

They all really have no place in the game, except maybe the ubersaw. They aren't op, just badly designed for random skill levels playing together, which makes them bad in my opinion.

Of all time? I was gonna say Castlevania but they screwed up things with recent releases. Instead I'll have to say Zelda games. Even though I don't like every zelda game, even the bad ones are still better than your average game.

Originally posted by The Extreme Potato:

Originally posted by SirDowner211:

I mean, I'm a huge fanboy of the Fallout series, and I sort of agree with what you're saying.

You haven't been on the Fallout 4 forums, the fanboys there tear apart any thread that criticises Bethesda to the point where is had to be locked or deleted.
My favourite is one guy who thinks he's the batman of the forums. Shitposting in the New Vegas forums to protect the Fallout 4 forums from the "Obsidian Trolls".

You sure about any thread? Because if it's just your thread or threads like it, tearing it a new asshole wouldn't be hard. Most the reasons are just downright opinion at best, most of which you would have to insult nearly every other fanbase to say your's is correct.

Originally posted by The Extreme Potato:

• They don't actually make RPGs. In my mind, a RPG is something like Fallout 2. A game that gives the player plenty of choice, so they can react according to how they think their character would react, and will then give you consequences for these choices. Bethesda games do nothing like that. You are given no choice on how to approach a something, you have to do it the way the game tells you to. And you never learn what the consequences of your actions are. You waltz in, do a quest and waltz back out again without any repercussions.

Bethesdia games are more rpg-ish than 90% of rpgs I've played. I mean if we're gonna say in order for something to be like an RPG it has to be like Fallout 2 then I haven't seen a "real" rpg since, well, forever. Apparently phantom brave isn't an rpg because choices aren't present. RPG is such a vague term and I guess everyone has their own definition of what it should be.


I mean RPG to most is just a role playing game. You're playing the role of a character, not necessarily your own. But that's too vague a term, because everything can be an rpg then so long as it gives you enough choices. So most people lump in that it's heavily stat and level focused, with character growth, building being a key part of the gameplay. In fact, to most people that's what makes an RPG an RPG, I don't believe the first is essential, otherwise I wouldn't consider anything short of dungeons and dragons an rpg.

Xenon, even though he's not a member. He's like, one of the least enjoyable people to get in a debate with, beside maybe Yuki.

Originally posted by Migueleby:

Kills friendlies
Caps on Hightower

But I cap on hightower and sometimes kill friendlies. Hightower is only fun for the first hour or so.