No one cares.

Because it's another annual cod release. Why waste 60€ on a game that will be superseded in 12 months anyway?

It's a bit early to hate, but I personally don't think it will be very good.

It's because people are tired of the same 'near future' shit that keeps coming out.

IW was the breaking point.

BF1 is in now.

Originally posted by Kryztal:

No one cares.

Edgy

It is because the publishers and devs and corperate suits don't listen to the player base. Almost all of the cod fans wanted something not like fucking star wars.

To me it looks really unoriginal. Space fighter games are a dime a dozen these days. Also, it's scientifically and physically impossible to fire a gun in the vacuum of space.

Originally posted by Krinkov:

To me it looks really unoriginal. Space fighter games are a dime a dozen these days. Also, it's scientifically and physically impossible to fire a gun in the vacuum of space.

Why?

I'm not familiar with space physics.

Originally posted by Stake from Jate Farm:

Originally posted by Krinkov:

To me it looks really unoriginal. Space fighter games are a dime a dozen these days. Also, it's scientifically and physically impossible to fire a gun in the vacuum of space.

Why?

I'm not familiar with space physics.

Space has no air, no air means no fire, no fire means no explosions, no explosions means no bullets, no bullets means no guns.

Originally posted by Krinkov:

Originally posted by Stake from Jate Farm:

Why?

I'm not familiar with space physics.

Space has no air, no air means no fire, no fire means no explosions, no explosions means no bullets, no bullets means no guns.

Ah.

Plus, in the event you COULD fire a gun in space, Newton's Law dictates that you will be sent flying in the opposite direction, as the same velocity. No air or ground to plant yourself in.

Originally posted by Stake from Jate Farm:

Originally posted by Krinkov:

Space has no air, no air means no fire, no fire means no explosions, no explosions means no bullets, no bullets means no guns.

Ah.

Plus, in the event you COULD fire a gun in space, Newton's Law dictates that you will be sent flying in the opposite direction, as the same velocity. No air or ground to plant yourself in.

In the end it's basically counter productive, and stupidly unrealistic in a game. I mean, it's a whole other level of unrealistic.

Originally posted by Stake from Jate Farm:

Originally posted by Krinkov:

Space has no air, no air means no fire, no fire means no explosions, no explosions means no bullets, no bullets means no guns.

Ah.

Plus, in the event you COULD fire a gun in space, Newton's Law dictates that you will be sent flying in the opposite direction, as the same velocity. No air or ground to plant yourself in.

Not the same velocity unless you possess the same amount of mass as a bullet.

You should've given up hope on the franchise after Ghosts.

I don't necessarily find the series that bad, heck, at least Ghosts worked, and I didn't like that game. I'll be planning to get Black Ops 3 for zombies, and when I upgrade my PC, I'll get the game again for the PC mods.

Other than that, well, place your hate on Activision, not the developers.

I mean, who gives a damn about IW, it's just more blatantly uninteresting trash for the compactor.

Originally posted by Krinkov:

Space has no air, no air means no fire, no fire means no explosions, no explosions means no bullets, no bullets means no guns.

Vacuum-functional/underwater-fucnctional firearms are a thing. They're impractcal as shit to make and prone to failure but they do exist.

That, and Newton is the deadliest son of a bitch in space. You shoot, it sends you spinning backwards, you need propulsion to stop that spin and that projectile isn't gonna stop anytime soon either, you're ruining someone's day, be it right there and then or three hundred years later.