Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Seriously, take off the "lol ww1 lol cod dead" goggles and you'll see that BF1 is just BF4.5, but worst.
If you want a realistic military game with proper use of maps, 100s-1000s of square kilometres in size with 200+ player servers with everything from the broader logistics down to the individual soldier, just play ArmA, don't expect it from Battlefield anymore - try Battlefield 2 or the original 1942 for bigger maps and servers done well. I'm definitely not defending Battlefield 1 either, it just looks like a lazy effort to plop BF4 onto WW1.
I mean, you'd probably hear the same complaints coming from someone who actually participated in WWI. Not that that makes for a fun game, but whatever.
kek
But this doesn't really surprise me, EA and DICE seem pretty set on making a WW1 game with modern gameplay and that just won't work. I could especially see vehicles suffering in this regard, as vehicles in WW1 were rubbish compared to what the average gamer is used to.
Even then, getting 5 roadkills on a horse happens often sadly, because the horses are as strong as the tanks.
I know the Polish using horses to fight tanks isn't true, and any time that it did happen was because the tanks were hiding behind houses, but I just wanted to make the refrence.
Sounds cool actually when you about it.