STEAM GROUP
Forum Regulars Connected frcco
STEAM GROUP
Forum Regulars Connected frcco
18
IN-GAME
89
ONLINE
Founded
11 January, 2016
Language
English
Location
Singapore 
Erick 3 Sep, 2016 @ 10:28pm
Battlefield 1 Beta is the Worst Beta I've Played This Year
Yep, you heard me, I was not pleased. Sure, it looks good, sure, it's WW1, but the gameplay, the running, the OP Snipers, and damn tanks, pretty much you can't do anything without getting shot at.

Let's start off, the map is absolute horribly, it's unnecessarily huge, like half the map is a waste of space, and they have the audacity to put a flag in the middle of nowhere instead of where the rest of the flags are. I get it, Battlefield is big open warfare, but Battlefield 1943, a PSN/XBL download title, compressed the size of the maps, which not only made the maps much more clear and smaller, but also increases the action, something of which in Battlefield 1, it's like less 10% of the game.

Speaking of which, it's an absolute running simulator. I know, it's just one map right now, but if other maps are going to be like this, then this is going to kill Battlefield 1 once idiotic bandwagon non/self-proclaimed Battlefield players realized that what they're playing is a dull game that's not only a reskin of BF3 and BF4, but also a game that only has its setting worth mentioning otherwise. Because of how huge the maps are, you think the vehicles would help, but horses are worth ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ when you're getting shot at. Should I mention that if you dare to try to move from one flag to another, you're going to get shot at by literally 5-7 guys of the enemy team who come in squads? I know, teammates, well, it would be fine if the "realistic" aiming and physics didn't screw you over all the damn time.

Because of how big these maps are, Snipers galore, the game. Seriously, there's like 2-3 Snipers in almost every building or somewhere near the desert, so you're the type of guy who rushes to the objective, well, tough luck buddy, enjoy getting sniped. Heck, you can get sniped just for spawning, because there's almost no cover in any of the spawns, so you basically have no choice but to run away before coming close to 1% health.

As for vehicles, they're familar Battlefield vehicles, like jeeps, jets, and of course, tanks. Tanks in WW1 aren't exactly efficient, but DICE decided to make them powerful like an actual tank we know now, except they went overboard. While yes, I do give props that you can now spawn in tanks if you died, which is great, the problem comes with that there are 4-5 gunner seats with the main driver, so basically, tanks are powerful in that it's not the driver you have to worry about, it's also the 4 annoying passengers shooting at you when you're trying to destroy it. Destroying tanks may as well be a luck game since it's hard to get close or throw ant-tank grenades when you have not only the passengers shooting at you, but also 3 Snipers with 2 SMG users shooting you as well. Seriously, there is not one moment when anything impressive or "wow" can happen in this game due to how limited you are, unlike BF3 and BF4.

Lastly, the physics and aiming. Regardless of what version you have, aiming feels stiff, because apparently, despite only carrying like a 5% of what Soldiers carry today, you somehow move so sluggish and slow to the point that you're wondering if you're playing as some soldier or just a poor sob drafted to join the war (Then again, the latter is true). Also, you can't jump three feet without losing like 10-20% of your health, because apparently, moving forward fast is a punishment. Because of this, the melee bayonet charge is like your only source of running speed, and even at that, you move like a rock if you didn't hit an enemy when charging, which rewards an insta-kill, which is neat and somewhat satisfying. As for aiming, on top of the "heavy" physics, the aiming is poor in that sometimes, you can feel the sensitivy right, other times, your aim feels "slower" or "faster" than usual, causing inconsistency in how you can take on enemies when shooting directly at them. It's funny when a game like Killzone 2, a PS3 exclusive FPS game, has a better feel in weight and aiming than Battlefield 1, which is supposed to the "realistic engine" game that it's claimed to be.

Did I mention how much I hate Snipers?

/rant
< >
Showing 1-15 of 34 comments
jua 3 Sep, 2016 @ 10:32pm 
Is it against the forum rules to pin this as a PSA for potential BF1 buyers?
Zennock 3 Sep, 2016 @ 10:33pm 
Originally posted by Medicinal Warlock:
Is it against the forum rules to pin this as a PSA for potential BF1 buyers?
While there aren't any rules for pinning threads, I would advise not to pin this thread.
Lagger 3 Sep, 2016 @ 10:34pm 
Battlefield has been suffering from this disease of size for a while. It's just a major shame they took the WWI games down with them.
Erick 3 Sep, 2016 @ 10:40pm 
Originally posted by Medicinal Warlock:
Is it against the forum rules to pin this as a PSA for potential BF1 buyers?
Originally posted by Zennock:
While there aren't any rules for pinning threads, I would advise not to pin this thread.
Eh, not really, but, I just want to share my experience and the glaring flaws. As an old Battlefield fan since 1942, this is basically everything wrong with blind hype.

Seriously, take off the "lol ww1 lol cod dead" goggles and you'll see that BF1 is just BF4.5, but worst.
gleofrocga 3 Sep, 2016 @ 10:47pm 
I don't think huge maps or slow game play is an issue, Battlefield 2 managed it quite well but this game is just an awkward mix of Battlefield 1 with WW1 taped on it. I would expect the gameplay to be slow, especially in a western front setting since apart from artillery barrages and pushes across no mans land, it was quite a stagnant war, but it's pretty much BF4 so it can't really get this right either since people just run around with SMGs, which were quite uncommon in WW1. Also, I don't think realism was ever Battlefield's strong point despite it trying to sell that, it's very much so an arcade shooter action game.

If you want a realistic military game with proper use of maps, 100s-1000s of square kilometres in size with 200+ player servers with everything from the broader logistics down to the individual soldier, just play ArmA, don't expect it from Battlefield anymore - try Battlefield 2 or the original 1942 for bigger maps and servers done well. I'm definitely not defending Battlefield 1 either, it just looks like a lazy effort to plop BF4 onto WW1.
Kay


I mean, you'd probably hear the same complaints coming from someone who actually participated in WWI. Not that that makes for a fun game, but whatever.
76109108007942031 3 Sep, 2016 @ 11:34pm 
"It's WW1"

kek

But this doesn't really surprise me, EA and DICE seem pretty set on making a WW1 game with modern gameplay and that just won't work. I could especially see vehicles suffering in this regard, as vehicles in WW1 were rubbish compared to what the average gamer is used to.
B-b-but you can run enemies over with horses!
Last edited by johnnySbaseballgame32@ohio.edu; 3 Sep, 2016 @ 11:36pm
Erick 3 Sep, 2016 @ 11:50pm 
Originally posted by Zalinto:
B-b-but you can run enemies over with horses!
Still got nothing on flying tanks that rammed a jet.

Even then, getting 5 roadkills on a horse happens often sadly, because the horses are as strong as the tanks.
Originally posted by Erick:
Originally posted by Zalinto:
B-b-but you can run enemies over with horses!
Still got nothing on flying tanks that rammed a jet.

Even then, getting 5 roadkills on a horse happens often sadly, because the horses are as strong as the tanks.
Wait, the horses are stronger than the tanks!? Please tell me you can run over tanks too with a horse.
76109108007942031 3 Sep, 2016 @ 11:56pm 
Originally posted by Erick:
Originally posted by Zalinto:
B-b-but you can run enemies over with horses!
Still got nothing on flying tanks that rammed a jet.

Even then, getting 5 roadkills on a horse happens often sadly, because the horses are as strong as the tanks.
You see, these are the ancient horses from Poland used against the Nazis in WWII. But wehraboo propaganda said that those were just normal horses that they were using against Nazi tanks.

I know the Polish using horses to fight tanks isn't true, and any time that it did happen was because the tanks were hiding behind houses, but I just wanted to make the refrence.
Erick 4 Sep, 2016 @ 12:07am 
Originally posted by Zalinto:
Wait, the horses are stronger than the tanks!? Please tell me you can run over tanks too with a horse.
Funny enough, a tank hitting a horse on contact does like 5 damage, yet a horse can flip a tank upside. WW1 physics at its finest.

Originally posted by Sir Illic:
You see, these are the ancient horses from Poland used against the Nazis in WWII. But wehraboo propaganda said that those were just normal horses that they were using against Nazi tanks.

I know the Polish using horses to fight tanks isn't true, and any time that it did happen was because the tanks were hiding behind houses, but I just wanted to make the refrence.
Sounds cool actually when you about it.
Erick 4 Sep, 2016 @ 12:29am 
Originally posted by Pizza Cake Double Take:
Originally posted by Erick:
Funny enough, a tank hitting a horse on contact does like 5 damage, yet a horse can flip a tank upside. WW1 physics at its finest.
Sounds cool actually when you about it.
Plot twist: the game takes place in a alternate universe where horses have superpowers.
That actually sounds better than BF1 right now actually.
novasunshine 4 Sep, 2016 @ 12:44am 
Yes, I didn't get to do anything because I can't see the mini map and it's just a clusterfuck.
Erick 4 Sep, 2016 @ 12:45am 
Originally posted by Ninten:
Yes, I didn't get to do anything because I can't see the mini map and it's just a clusterfuck.
It doesn't help the map is a heaven for sniping, so if you plan on using anything else and move in the slightest, well, you're good as dead 99.9% of the time.
Last edited by Erick; 4 Sep, 2016 @ 12:45am
< >
Showing 1-15 of 34 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: 3 Sep, 2016 @ 10:28pm
Posts: 34