STEAM GROUP
Forum Regulars Connected frcco
STEAM GROUP
Forum Regulars Connected frcco
10
IN-GAME
68
ONLINE
Founded
11 January, 2016
Language
English
Location
Singapore 
This topic has been locked
Shypigeon 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:41pm
Petition to demod Erick.
He abused his powers, he usually has nothing constructive to say in thread, moderates badly, and locked a thread because someone disagreed with him.
He also has a bias against certain users.

Will update come the morrow
Last edited by Shypigeon; 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:45pm
< >
Showing 1-15 of 68 comments
Lyz920 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:42pm 
i already partook in a flamewar but i will lock it to make myself look better


uh, signed.
Last edited by Lyz920; 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:42pm
milk 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:42pm 
not really, it says clearly in the rules:

2. Do not flamebait or actively start flame wars.

that's what most of the thread comments were about
"drama is what makes this group alive"
"flamewars arent allowed tho"


eh???
dino_inc 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:43pm 
Noooope.

Unsigned.
Shypigeon 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:43pm 
Originally posted by ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:
not really, it says clearly in the rules:

2. Do not flamebait or actively start flame wars.

that's what most of the thread comments were about
"drama is what makes this group alive"
"flamewars arent allowed tho"


eh???
He helped derail it.
This is not moderator behaviour.
milk 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:43pm 
it's almost as if you just want to make a part two of the last thread to keep the drama going or you just got pissed at Erick for stopping it
milk 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:44pm 
Originally posted by Pigeonbee:
Originally posted by ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:
not really, it says clearly in the rules:

2. Do not flamebait or actively start flame wars.

that's what most of the thread comments were about
"drama is what makes this group alive"
"flamewars arent allowed tho"


eh???
He helped derail it.
This is not moderator behaviour.
Derailing flamewars
If flamewars aren't allowed in the first place, who's going to extinguish them
Shypigeon 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:45pm 
Originally posted by ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:
Originally posted by Pigeonbee:
He helped derail it.
This is not moderator behaviour.
Derailing flamewars
If flamewars aren't allowed in the first place, who's going to extinguish them
>feeding the fire

Oy vey, acceptable behavior!
Last edited by Shypigeon; 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:45pm
Lyz920 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:45pm 
Originally posted by ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:
Originally posted by Pigeonbee:
He helped derail it.
This is not moderator behaviour.
Derailing flamewars
If flamewars aren't allowed in the first place, who's going to extinguish them
He didn't fucking partake in "derailing" the flamewar, he was involved in it.
Erick helped derail the thread with being involved in the flamewar
Otherwise he would've locked it himself before it was too late.
no one cares 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:46pm 
Don't mind me, just here to watch from afar
Erick 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:47pm 
I take it as that you have never been in any other forum in your life.

You inexperienced fool. Sorry, but drama, you got to be really boring of a person, how is it possible to be more boring than me?
quetz 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:47pm 
Originally posted by ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:
Originally posted by Pigeonbee:
He helped derail it.
This is not moderator behaviour.
Derailing flamewars
If flamewars aren't allowed in the first place, who's going to extinguish them
That didn't look like a flamewar to me though.
I haven't seen any personal attacks except for when people actually tried to derail that thread.
milk 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:48pm 
Originally posted by Shadowcon66:
Originally posted by ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:
Derailing flamewars
If flamewars aren't allowed in the first place, who's going to extinguish them
He didn't fucking partake in "derailing" the flamewar, he was involved in it.
Erick helped derail the thread with being involved in the flamewar
Otherwise he would've locked it himself before it was too late.
I only added him and told him to lock it because really the whole flamewar was over pyrofish and I've had enough of that shit, and I'm sure everyone here is too, majority wins really, considering the votes on both adding her in and modding her,

I wouldn't really blame him for getting in the arguement, he was dropping constructive criticism on the subject anyway oops
Last edited by milk; 2 Nov, 2016 @ 3:10pm
milk 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:49pm 
Originally posted by フハイ:
Originally posted by ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:
Derailing flamewars
If flamewars aren't allowed in the first place, who's going to extinguish them
That didn't look like a flamewar to me though.
I haven't seen any personal attacks except for when people actually tried to derail that thread.
You and Pigeon pretty much start this up everytime a topic is made about pyrofish, and we'd have one of those threads where no one can shut the fuck up about pyrofish because it's such a contreversial topic at this point that no one wants to accept
Lyz920 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:49pm 
Originally posted by Erick:
I take it as that you have never been in any other forum in your life.

You inexperienced fool. Sorry, but drama, you got to be really boring of a person, how is it possible to be more boring than me?
I've been in the game for even longer than you have.
There have been so many other places on-line.
I don't think you' get to say this, because even I know you're wrong.
Last edited by Lyz920; 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:49pm
quetz 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:49pm 
Originally posted by ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:
Originally posted by Shadowcon66:
He didn't fucking partake in "derailing" the flamewar, he was involved in it.
Erick helped derail the thread with being involved in the flamewar
Otherwise he would've locked it himself before it was too late.
I only added him and told him to lock it because really the whole flamewar was over pyrofish and I've had enough of that shit, and I'm sure everyone here is too, majority wins really, considering the votes on both adding her in and modding her,

I wouldn't really blame him for getting in the arguement, he was dropping constructive criticism on the subject anyway
>majority wins
>I asked because I'm sure

Originally posted by ᴍɪʟᴋᴍᴀɴ:
I wouldn't really blame him for getting in the arguement, he was dropping constructive criticism on the subject anyway
what the fuck
< >
Showing 1-15 of 68 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: 2 Nov, 2016 @ 2:41pm
Posts: 68