Søkeresultater

Smooth criminals are more aerodynamic and therefore harder to catch.

Thats what we call a skill issue.

Its a shame there aren't any team-centric contracts.

(Someone here hates spellcheck. I wish Valve would fix that already...)


Its not if but when I have a girlfriend, it wouldn't matter as there's more to life than button mashing. But if she's gonna smash my pc I'll have to reconsider the relationship.

Find a job that you can do immediately(no training) or can do with the employer's training(if they give it). While you're earning income and not living on the street look for that better job with tasks you might actually enjoy doing. See if they require any special training and then go there when you're ready. Its better than winning the lottery if you enjoy the career you're in.

Opprinnelig skrevet av Rumpelcrutchskin:

Impeaching them sure doesn`t work.

That requires a non-made up case and provable evidence. Thanks for playing. Brace for countersuits.

Opprinnelig skrevet av Namsan:

People really should stop voting for billionaires, they do nothing good

Billionaires create great jobs for millions of people, until they become corrupted by politics.

Jail.
Directly to jail.
Tried in court by impartial judges and possibly a jury of their peers, depending on the proof level required.
Released or incarcerated as determined during their sentencing.

Opprinnelig skrevet av Crystal Sharrd:

I started out by teaching myself out to program on a TI-83+ graphing calculator, made some text adventure games.

Tick tac toe on the graph screen using an endless loop to detect which number key was pressed or edit using getKey->thekey and if statements is fun enough. If you can make it a network game between two TI-83's then you've got something. (Use the CBL commands...?)

Your source link is msn, so I already distrust any 'news' that might be in there, but I'll look at it anyway. The administration has zero reason to fake any numbers since its doing the job we elected them to do. The claim just doesn't make sense. I'll respond more after reading this so-called article.

-----
In the middle of said article the main pull quote seems to be some definitional quibble over the use of 'some' vs 'many'. The stuff that brings migraines to non-lawyers.

Having around 20 to 30 troops instead of 115 shows restraint and a proportional response I guess... but this doesn't seem to be a sticking point, just that it wasn't ever 115 in Portland. Given that this doesn't seem to show any heavy handedness by the administration(they could have sent much more than 115) I don't see what the deal is.

Also there's so many stays and counterstays with different due dates I can't really follow if there is a current stay and when it ends. If there's no current stay order the guards could go in right now. This article is a little muddy on whats currently in effect.