Case in point, knife violence in China and Japan.

Originally posted by Mr. Smiles:

Case in point, knife violence in China and Japan.

HMU when someone racks up a 22 knife kill streak mmmkay bye bue

Originally posted by Fajita Jim:

Originally posted by Mr. Smiles:

Case in point, knife violence in China and Japan.

HMU when someone racks up a 22 knife kill streak mmmkay bye bue

Per capita or w/e.

Originally posted by Fajita Jim:

Originally posted by Mr. Smiles:

Case in point, knife violence in China and Japan.

HMU when someone racks up a 22 knife kill streak mmmkay bye bue

it happens, but not with anywhere near the same regularity or ease as with guns. i mean it is just simple logic. large knifing sprees (including deaths) can happen, but it is simply easier to kill many faster with a gun. so many choose the gun, and many hurt far more with the gun much, much faster and have the added bonus of too many being afraid to stop them.

as surviving a knife attack is generally more likely than surviving a gun attack. so peoples may at least attempt to fight the knife attacker.

Originally posted by Fajita Jim:

Originally posted by Mr. Smiles:

Case in point, knife violence in China and Japan.

HMU when someone racks up a 22 knife kill streak mmmkay bye bue

Additionally, if someone breaks into your house with a knife, at least you can get a knife to fight back. If you have the time, of course (but that applies to guns as well).

Originally posted by Pierce Dalton:

Why do people keep using this stupid argument?

Ffs two men can imobilize a guy with a knife.

Not without at least one running the risk of being fatally wounded... if not both.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fxyRL7MX8E

Actually, this notion should be pushed back on.

The ease of the weapon is a definite factor in causing people to actually go through with it.

Originally posted by BitsOfSkin:

Originally posted by Pierce Dalton:

Why do people keep using this stupid argument?

Ffs two men can imobilize a guy with a knife.

Not without at least one running the risk of being fatally wounded... if not both.

Oh well, you can also run if you don't wanna take any risks.

You can't run from bullets, though.

Originally posted by ṼṏẌṏḭḊ:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fxyRL7MX8E

Good job, Murphy!

Ja please give uns all of your guns. Ve vill mek you safe and gif you order

Criminals don't obey the law.

Originally posted by Pierce Dalton:

Originally posted by Fajita Jim:

HMU when someone racks up a 22 knife kill streak mmmkay bye bue

Additionally, if someone breaks into your house with a knife, at least you can get a knife to fight back. If you have the time, of course (but that applies to guns as well).

Or throw a pit bull at em.

Originally posted by HypersleepyNaputunia:

Ja please give uns all of your guns. Ve vill mek you safe and gif you order

You're missing the point entirely.

Would you rather be attacked by someone using a firearm or a blade? Don't you think you have a higher chance of surviving if the perpetrator is carrying a knife instead of a .45?