Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Back in the day when we just had reviews in magazines or just online magazines, no peer reviews, I would always just be interested in what was in the game and how it was, not the opinion of the person. I never cared about their opinions. I was just interested in the games content.
I never understood why people would only buy games based on others. I guess they have their reasons? But people are individuals with different likes and dislikes. I don't know though, I personally can never let someone decide something for me. Just too weird.
But yeah, I love a lot of the non-famous games. They're my style of genre and gameplay. If I only got the highly positive or high selling and trendy ones, dang my life would be boring.
If a game have lots of complaint about performance I'll just find other game, don't wanna risk it.
I would say this is true for physical products because generally they're either good or they're bad right? But something like a video game is really subjective, much like a movie or music.
Obviously nobody likes a buggy mess that crashes every hour but I've found that generally 2 hours is enough time to determine if a game is a buggy mess, and if it is then I will refund it.
I think it's because I'm looking for reassurance that my money won't be wasted. I'm not living pay check to pay check but I'm also not a millionaire so when it comes to buying stuff, I still want to make sure my money is not going to waste.
So the moment I see a negative review that criticises an aspect of the game, it puts me off and I start looking for a different game. Even when the ratio of positives to negatives is like 10:1. It's a habit I've built up over the last 20 years really.
That's what I do and consider it the opposite of stupid. That - review was probably not just the usual "gg" with 2 hours played of the game that is meant to have 60, but goes to detail explaining what was expected and what got instead playing beyond the tutorial.
sure, you have money to burn and only aim to have 1000 games on the acc, buy ahead. Or don't count your time a value and happy to waste it on mediocre experience.
Those who look for certain playing experience are better off looking at YT play videos and reading reviews.
OTOH, just prefiltering by statistics and not even look at positive is stupid indeed. I personally don't bother with "mixed" unless special circumstances apply, but overwhelmingly positive is an unfair bar, many people dislike a game exactly for having what I look for, i.e need to think rather than just scroll/click through.
They are almost always useless and personally I would never buy something based on reviews..
If you can see and hear, then there is more than enough official informations on games for you to make a guess about if it's for you or not
You will never see or hear why people ended up skipping the game