Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
video games aren't a "need"
I thought Warzone 2100 was quite good back then.
However, that doesn't actually matter -- I'm always in favor of letting companies do any game they want to do, and leaving it to customers such as myself to decide whether I want to buy it or not. That's what a "free market" is all about.
Is there a guarantee that I will buy it? Definitely not. I've played a lot of Warcraft II and Diablo II back then, but... I haven't bought anything Blizzard since. It would be same for Warzone -- it really depends on what they come up with. I don't drool over names.