Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Well quantum computing is slowly coming, They sort of have it but when Ai uses it, That might open up something quite powerful.
Normal computing is like a straight 2D line, Quantum computing is like a 3D line. (an example)
... which are also just executing their program.
I find it funny that the 1982 TRON movie played with that premise. Namely, that the "Master Control Program" was basically a chess program before, but somehow managed to grow into something bigger, to the point it determined its OWN directive eventually and didn't care for the directives given to it by its users. I guess the real question is, is an AI program being flexible when it solves a problem a different way, or is it actually no longer a typical AI program because it would be considered "self-aware" and "sentient" at that point?
It doesn't have to be self aware to be flexible. Typically they would look at their own games they played and remember which moves led to wins or losses, which is going to make the computer develop different habits depending on who it played against.
individual chess computers could sort of develop a "personality," because even if they start with the same code, they won't play the same games so they all learn a bit differently, plus if they have different hardware it will also affect how it plays and therefore how it learns, because faster multithreaded CPU's with more memory can "think" quicker and more deeply and are more likely to find optimal moves right away, where as a computer with weak hardware will do what it can to find a solution quickly which isn't usually the best solution, it's just the best one it could find within the time constraints of a game of chess. Eventually it has to stop thinking and make a move which may not be the best one.
With Javascript.
-JS is considered very forgiving.
Too forgiving for some.
It will adapt to a certain degree to make the program work where it is possible.
The drawback is potentially it making a calculation you do not want it to while it tries to work through the users poor coding (or intentionally bad coding).