Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem



I don´t hav any interest in any of the games they create and why would I rent for that high an amount a month, instead of just buying and keeping the game I really want.
It seems very counter productive to give out running revenue to a singular publisher like that without having any say in what is created for one or what is avaliable.
I could understand giving out a sub in a really good mmoRPG, but not for that price either.
I bought my games from Ubisoft. Why should I pay them anything else?
When I bought Anno 1800, it was cheaper to buy some DLCs with an annual subscription.
Nintendo's been going downhill for years. Subscriptions are just the straw that broke the camel's back.
Is the same guy now walking about the games industry?