Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem



In California our guide booklet was 30 pages... just for one statewide proposition. Over 80% of it was how to find a polling place, etc.
Wow. Talk about making it harder than it needs to be just to be aware of a candidate's policies. What happened to bullet points and summaries? "Keep it simple, stupid". Especially when they consider most voters to be no more intelligent than a 6th grade reading level. How the hell do they expect ANYBODY to read freaking 10 pages, nevermind 30?!
And that's for ONE candidate probably for ONE state proposition. Seems like it's complex by design. If voters don't know what the hell they're voting for, they're less likely to vote against VERY unpopular measures that would have prevented that candidate from winning.
The smart things like the best way to have elections get squashed before they become bills because it challenges their power.
Now it doesn't even mention that. It simply has candidates names' and parties, and NOTHING else. Like, what's that supposed to tell me? They don't want people voting "along party lines" but your only option essentially IS to vote along party lines. You're sure as hell not presented with any actual policies or bills that so and so candidate supports or opposes.
https://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/proposition/50/
Sounds a lot like the Auckland council voting, You have no clue who you're voting for, You get a pamphlet saying a short paragraph and that's it.
That would be a lot easier if the tools to do so weren't spread across several websites and organizations, all whom number in the hundreds, especially with regards to local elections. We know that national elections get enough attention so that people are aware of the Presidential candidates' platform because they HAVE to debate each other. But you don't really get that in local or state politics (unless you count their negative campaign ads).
And it's not like I was even aware of HALF the people on the ballot that I would have been able to look them up, since I didn't even know who was up for reelection and who's a newcomer. I live in NJ, which mostly swings Democrat anyway. If local general elections are anything like the national one, then the vote will go one way regardless of the choice I make. Sad as it is to say.
Last year before the presidential election, I was able to find issue statements from all six of the candidates on our ballot, not just the two from the major party.
If you don't want to do any research, you may as well not vote.
We have the internet. Every politician has an issues page. Again, no one has to vote. If someone goes to the polls uninformed in the year 2025 they are part of the problem not the solution.
Then most Americans might as well not vote. Because if you want to talk about people being informed, you'd have to assume they made themselves aware of all the issues, and those issues and platforms were presented to them in a way that didn't require them going out of their way to dig out of their "magic hat" the names of the people running just so they know who's even in the running, much less what their platforms are.
The fact of the matter is, the people who vote most of the time aren't likely to be voting because they're informed. And those who did inform themselves might as well be banging their head against a brick wall, because the unintelligent voters' votes cancel THEIR votes out. So you might be right about one thing. People who are intelligent and informed should be the ones voting, but unfortunately, democracy says that "my ignorance is just as good as your intelligence".
And that should frighten terrify you.