Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
since she did not seem to mention greggs, i cannot say i agree
It's a New World Order.
They were well informed of the risks of the modern laws, I even wrote about the risks myself mostly to be pushed aside as 'paranoid'.
So, frankly, after years of warning of which they repeatedly ignored? They deserve everything they get as they were well informed of the risks and chose to ignore them.
They reap what they sow. They were warned.
They will be treating / are treating jokes or comments with the seriousness as it does with other / all areas of the population.
The danger of jokes / comments on the internet is it can affect peoples perspective and bring a certain level of acceptability in the minds of many or even a few that others are lesser.
British Humour and general speech had always been about pushing to the upmost edge of good taste / acceptability and then that is what would be the humour.
That has changed a lot now.
I have not seen the tweets or comments.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6V3GepQRLg
That's incorrect. He was arrested because he threatened violence against trans people.
The Prime Minister immediately criticised the police for making the arrest, saying that they should get on and solve serious crimes.
The problem at the moment is that the police action every single crime of this nature and they need to get things in proportion. I suspect that there will be changes to the laws, redefining what is serious and what is trivial because the police seem confused about this.
The laws were created after people made death threats online and there were riots during tensions over immigration.
As per typical with knee-jerk laws, the politicians didn't stop to think of the consequences. The laws are necessary, but are being taken too far by the police, and need guidelines on when to arrest people and when to just caution them.
Don't panic, it's not the end of democracy in the UK. It's a blip. It wasn't an intended effect and it's not the start of authoritarianism.
People are reacting strongly to the laws and I am sure they will be changed.
If people think that guy is acceptable then ok that is your right to have freedom of thought.
There is humour and then there is just unbridled hate.
His twitter / X is of the dehumanising nature and will shape some peoples views to be hateful / look down on others.
-Democracy in my view is about accepting one and all as equals, you may disagree with them and that is the strength of it, the right to disagree. Not the right to promote that others are lesser because they are different.