Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Highly illegal and amoral. People are ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ stupid and mob mentality eliminates every ounce of criticial thinking. This is exactly the way, innocent people get killed in countries like Pakistan, where mere allegations of blashpemy are enough to get one lynched. Nobody is preventing someone from just inventing claimes of child molestation, share an adress online and then watch an innocent person have their life ruined.
This is exactly, why we have an objective justice system.
reddit did that when trying to track down a terrorist
The law isn't perfect but id rather that than mob mentality.
People don't have to take matters into their own hands so long as the police and judges are doing their jobs.
They have the technology , the expertise and they can get a lot more information about the situation and spy / gather intelligence on the person and any group if it is there.
Vigilantes are like the rookie security guard thinking hes busting a badman over a drug offence not knowing they just stomped over a multi agency drug swoop type operation. That can happen with all kinds of things.
Watch Point Break. I actually felt bad for the undercover.
On all other type of things when you say Vigilante you mean on a civilian stopping a shoplifting or theft taking place?
This is again a very much a person going against the unknown.
That shoplifter could be violent, they could have backup the vigilante does not know about, it could be a security operation of a person checking the security and any responses on the cameras or store detectives.
So a vigilante could just have just damaged some security work.
Personally if a person is being harmed in the shop or outside on pavement carpark wherever, they are being mugged or attacked or plain beaten up then I would intervene BUT keep in mind if you harm a person no matter how noble you believe it is you could be facing charges yourself.
So this comes back to my mantra of telling people train professionally by professionals.
IF you get harmed or harm another there is risk of psychological issue too afterwards. *1
That kind of thing does not mean a person is soft or weak it is how people are made.
You could get a flashback or something ten years down the road while at the time of the event feel fine and have no issue.
Obviously not always but the brain is a complex being.
I am not saying run for cover screaming just saying be aware of dangers and the long term effects.
*1 even if you 'win' using the term loosely, you still may experience something further down the years.
also i saw a 17 year old get beat up for meeting with a 16 year old
i guess if you live somewhere cops wont investigate then locals will have to