Maybe giving Alaska to Putin would help.

Surprised he doesn't just say the war is over anything that says otherwise is fake news, it works for every other lie he says for the people that still support him.

no sure why the us would need to do something about russia and ukraine issues

Originally posted by MadMarkMagee:

Putin seems to just want to bomb the hell out of every part of Ukraine and not actually talk peace.

Just more side-loaded (attached to factual statements to slip into the mind of lazy thinkers) propaganda here, nothing to see. The globalist bankers who run NATO have been trying to take over Russia since the days of the Bolsheviks and they continue to push ridiculous lies in the media so as to promote war, and convince people to enlist, as they have been doing forever. Pretty much everything you read about Putin and Russia in western mainstream media is lies and misinformation.

Originally posted by Big&Black:

Originally posted by MadMarkMagee:

Putin seems to just want to bomb the hell out of every part of Ukraine and not actually talk peace.

Just more side-loaded (attached to factual statements to slip into the mind of lazy thinkers) propaganda here, nothing to see. The globalist bankers who run NATO have been trying to take over Russia since the days of the Bolsheviks and they continue to push ridiculous lies in the media so as to promote war, and convince people to enlist, as they have been doing forever. Pretty much everything you read about Putin and Russia in western mainstream media is lies and misinformation.

Enlighten us then. Tell us what's really going on i.e. presumably Russia didn't invade Ukraine and didn't bomb Kyiv overnight, once again?

Originally posted by allegedly:

no sure why the us would need to do something about russia and ukraine issues

Logically, yes, but then Trump placed himself into it with his words before election and since election.

To save face? Nothing, his followers are lemmings.

Originally posted by allegedly:

no sure why the us would need to do something about russia and ukraine issues

They wanted to be The Super Power of the world with Nuclear Weapons so having as few people as possible getting in the way of them being able to lean on anybody was beneficial to them hence 'Ukraine give up the weapons to Russia'
Ukraine "Russia will invade!"
America : 'No they wont here is bit of paper, we and the uk and russia will sign and we will be there if you are invaded'
russia : 'of course we will not invade, we are a peaceful country now'

Ukraine hands over the weapons.
Fast forward a little later in my lifetime , Black Sea is blockaded, land bridge built Crimea is taken and an invasion to take Kyiv is underway.

Million casualties
Millions of people displaced
Rise of the Drone warfare - not good thing this will speed up the destruction of borders world over.

Ukraine were right, they needed the nuclear weapons.

Originally posted by Corvus XIII:

Ukraine were right, they needed the nuclear weapons.

No nation will ever give up nuclear weapons ever again after this fiasco.

id say whatever to run the U.S.A.

Originally posted by MadMarkMagee:

Trump said he had a good relationship with Putin and could end the war. Putin seems to just want to bomb the hell out of every part of Ukraine and not actually talk peace.

What should Trump do now to save face (since he opened his mouth about it all in the first place)?

dont know man, brics seem to be ready to fight back against trump and he taco bell against china

the plan was replace china by india, but since he become hostile against india, i dont see what is his plan c, because he turn hostile against brazil too

so you replace china, india and brazil by what ??

Originally posted by Stingray_tm:

Originally posted by Corvus XIII:

Ukraine were right, they needed the nuclear weapons.

No nation will ever give up nuclear weapons ever again after this fiasco.

we know that since usa invaded iraq

Originally posted by Corvus XIII:

Originally posted by allegedly:

no sure why the us would need to do something about russia and ukraine issues

a piece of paper

sure, they also signed a piece of paper stating nato wouldn't expand, the did expand though
anyway but I still don't get why some people want the us to go to other continents and resolve issues such as the russia ukraine thing

Originally posted by allegedly:

Originally posted by Corvus XIII:

a piece of paper

sure, they also signed a piece of paper stating nato wouldn't expand, the did expand though
anyway but I still don't get why some people want the us to go to other continents and resolve issues such as the russia ukraine thing

Because I am bored of repeating myself a hundred times :
AI copy pasta.

There was no legally binding, written treaty promise that NATO would never expand eastward after German reunification.

Explanation (concise):

In 1990, during negotiations over German reunification, U.S., British, and Soviet officials debated whether NATO forces would move into East Germany and whether NATO would expand “east” beyond unified Germany.

Multiple Western officials made verbal assurances to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not station substantial forces in the former East Germany; these assurances focused on East Germany, not on all of Eastern Europe.

Key documented statements:
In February 1990, U.S. Secretary of State James Baker told Gorbachev that NATO would not expand “one inch eastward” — this referred to stationing NATO forces in the territory of the former East Germany.

Other Western diplomats (e.g., German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher) made similar oral reassurances at the time.
However:

Those assurances were not written into the final Two Plus Four Treaty (the 1990 treaty resolving Germany’s status) nor into any binding NATO-Soviet/Russian treaty.

Subsequent NATO decisions (1999, 2004, later rounds) to admit former Warsaw Pact countries and Baltic states occurred legally under NATO’s open-door policy and with the consent of NATO members and applicant countries.

Russian leaders (including Vladimir Putin) later cited the 1990 assurances as a broken promise and used that claim to argue against NATO expansion; historians and legal scholars note the difference between political assurances and formal treaty obligations.

Originally posted by allegedly:

Originally posted by Corvus XIII:

a piece of paper

sure, they also signed a piece of paper stating nato wouldn't expand, the did expand though
anyway but I still don't get why some people want the us to go to other continents and resolve issues such as the russia ukraine thing

I know you don't see the "thing" and there is little point answering further.