Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Madagascar.
New Zealand, altough someone will probably send a nuke there from spite.
Switzerland because the amount of doomsday bunkers and preparedness for it is absolutely crazy there.
Better be dead in nuclear war then live there.
A single detonation is not harmful if you are far enough away, considering that over 200 airborne tests were performed in total and the planet hasn't even noticed.
Additionally, Russell Seitz suggests that Nuclear Winter is not a global phenomenon.
But it needs to be out of the way so it isn't a target or directly downwind of one.
So someplace like the Galapagos.
The planet has noticed. The air has already been permenently irradiated to the point where you have to salvage pre-hiroshima and nagasaki steel if you want to build accurate radiation detecting equipment (medical normally).
It's why there's a huge industry in illegally salvaging WW1 and WW2 gravesite wrecks.