By all means, I welcome it; I have no business with the affairs of others where it doesn't concern me. Until it becomes my problem, I'll be watching at a distance by the sidelines.

I dont agree, even medics are needed in war.

It depends on who or what they are actually fighting for. Sometimes things aren't always as they seem.

Originally posted by White:

"If your not here to fight, get out of the way of people who are"

"If your not here to help, get out of the way of people who are."

Depends on the context. Boxers and EMTs? Agree. Left wing agitators? Disagree.

fighting is of ink

No, it sounds a bit too naïve to tell people what to do.
Besides, it's not like I'd know any better than them..

And, eh-
How about you?
I can't see you providing your answer to your questions anywhere yet.

Who in the history of quotes has ever said that?

I agree with people just getting out of my way in general.

"Lead, follow, or get out of the way"

Originally posted by Grendalcat:

"Lead, follow, or get out of the way"

Ah, Idiocracy. Classic

Originally posted by Eskimofo:

Originally posted by Grendalcat:

"Lead, follow, or get out of the way"

Ah, Idiocracy. Classic

See, now THAT is a quote. Short and to the point. Sayings can't be a paragraph

Originally posted by Shiro♌:

No, it sounds a bit too naïve to tell people what to do.
Besides, it's not like I'd know any better than them..

And, eh-
How about you?
I can't see you providing your answer to your questions anywhere yet.

I'll give an example

A fire has broken out at a house, you aren't going to go into the fire and save anyone. But you see a fire fighter and want to argue with them. Another fire fighter arrives, to go into the house. But you want them involved in the argument too.

Originally posted by White:

I'll give an example

A fire has broken out at a house, you aren't going to go into the fire and save anyone. But you see a fire fighter and want to argue with them. Another fire fighter arrives, to go into the house. But you want them involved in the argument too.

You know you just described a crime.
"it is a crime to obstruct or prevent a firefighter from doing their job,"

Originally posted by White:

Originally posted by Shiro♌:

No, it sounds a bit too naïve to tell people what to do.
Besides, it's not like I'd know any better than them..

And, eh-
How about you?
I can't see you providing your answer to your questions anywhere yet.

I'll give an example

A fire has broken out at a house, you aren't going to go into the fire and save anyone. But you see a fire fighter and want to argue with them. Another fire fighter arrives, to go into the house. But you want them involved in the argument too.

That is a bad example.. Nobody's ever gonna try to argue and waste the precious time during such moments. Nobody.

I wouldn't have asked you for your answer to the question just for the sake of it. I was genuinely curious.. Replying with a simple no instead of the riddle would've make things so much easier.

Nope, for two reasons:

First, they refute each other.
Second, neither is spelled correctly.