At this point, anyone still a Hasan Piker fan is maniacal.

All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details

V-Bro - The Titan's Driver 12 Oct @ 11:38am

At this point, anyone still a Hasan Piker fan is maniacal.

I've come to learn this in my years:
Many political activists, in their ever-eternal quest to demonize their opponents, will instantly turn around to defend the indefensible when one of THEIR people does it.

And Hasan's shock collar fiasco is now a perfect real-world example of that.

YES, HE USED A SHOCK COLLAR on his dog and we all know it.
The champagne socialist knows we know; his defenders know too; that's why they're running defense to the most irrational point of denial.

They trying every tactic from gaslighting to doctoring the footage, with some people outright banning others for mentioning the incident on Twitch and Reddit (of course

). They're lashing out, and it's gotten as pathetic as it is dangerous.

We know that if their political rivals, plus anyone they label Nutzis' or whatever, was even suspected of doing the EXACT same thing, Piker's fanatics would jump all over it and make every efforts to completely de-platform them, among other things...
Look at what they condemn, then look at what they support - you realize real fast that their values and principles are WORTHLESS. These are horrible people trying (and failing) to convince you they are righteous saints.

No statement, not even 'But what about Palestine?' or 'It's a far-right campaign!' is going to distract from the fact: Hasan Piker used a shock-collar live and lied about it, and his remaining fans protected him and are scummy for doing so.
(I have much stronger words, but Steam might chastise me for being disrespectful - isn't that ironic?)

Shock-collar animal abusers - THAT is the kind of person that Piker's meat shields intend to force you to praise and support no matter what.
Never forget that, and make sure they don't either, especially when they go on one of their holier-than-thou political rants.

(Place your bets on if one of those fanatics slithers in from Reddit to rage below.)

< >

Showing 1-15 of 55 comments

Moogal 12 Oct @ 1:37pm

Leftists who become the faschists they hated?

🆂🅾🅻🅸🅳🆄🆂 🆂🅽🅰🅺🅴 12 Oct @ 1:45pm

He's violated so many of Youtube's terms of services yet he isn't banned or demonitized, but a right winger might get insta perma banned just for breathing incorrectly, so hypocritical. I thought people would have given up on that clown when he was encouraging his followers to go out and unalive Trump supporters and conservatives, but I guess not.

Dwerklesberry 12 Oct @ 6:43pm

Its pretty standard now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJj3uI4Kc_Y
https://youtu.be/1mCH9YQYbTg

Even what the Russian's had on Hillary reveals she has fits of rage.
https://youtu.be/YrknXdPjXb8
and of course the drunk
https://youtu.be/tQAlTA1eLMg

Dwerklesberry 12 Oct @ 8:01pm

Sums it up
https://x.com/feelsdesperate/status/1977118286442549257

$2 Hero 12 Oct @ 8:12pm

imagine being too stupid to train a dog lmao

Talby 12 Oct @ 9:37pm

Love the AI memes of the dog shocking Hasan 🤣

Garlic breath attack! 12 Oct @ 9:41pm

He's a good-for-nothing privileged waste of flesh, but we didn't need to see him abuse a dog to know that.

Dom 12 Oct @ 10:49pm

It's the same tactic as Trump supporters defending Trump's crimes (sexual assault, 34 felonies of financial crime). They say "fake news, didn't happen" and go after people who talk about it.

Sure denialism is annoying no matter the side but the current president of the US is fundamentally based on denialism.

trash can 12 Oct @ 10:51pm

Originally posted by Dom:
It's the same tactic as Trump supporters defending Trump's crimes (sexual assault, 34 felonies of financial crime). They say "fake news, didn't happen" and go after people who talk about it.

Sure denialism is annoying no matter the side but the current president of the US is fundamentally based on denialism.

When half of what you see on the media is Trump being taken out of context, smeared with pure lies, why would anyone believe anything negative about him even if it could be true?

The media only have themselves to blame for crying wolf, because now whether it's true or not, anything anti-trump is held to scrutiny, "another smear campaign? or the truth? don't care, still voting for Trump"

Good job getting Trump elected lefties.

This is different though, everything bad Hasan has done has been demonstrable and attested.

Last edited by trash can; 12 Oct @ 10:53pm

Dom 12 Oct @ 10:55pm

Originally posted by trash can:
Originally posted by Dom:
It's the same tactic as Trump supporters defending Trump's crimes (sexual assault, 34 felonies of financial crime). They say "fake news, didn't happen" and go after people who talk about it.

Sure denialism is annoying no matter the side but the current president of the US is fundamentally based on denialism.
When half of what you see on the media is Trump being taken out of context, smeared with pure lies, why would anyone believe anything negative about him even if it could be true?

The media only have themselves to blame for crying wolf, because now whether it's true or not, anything anti-trump is held to scrutiny, "another smear campaign? or the truth? don't care, still voting for Trump"

Good job getting Trump elected lefties.

Half of the Hasan clips you can find from the internet are also taken out of context and with a narrative to paint him in the bad light. Are you now going to deny all of his wrongdoings? Quoting you: "why would anyone believe anything negative about him even if it could be true?".

You see how ridiculous that sounds when I do 180.

#10

trash can 12 Oct @ 10:57pm

Originally posted by Dom:
Originally posted by trash can:
When half of what you see on the media is Trump being taken out of context, smeared with pure lies, why would anyone believe anything negative about him even if it could be true?

The media only have themselves to blame for crying wolf, because now whether it's true or not, anything anti-trump is held to scrutiny, "another smear campaign? or the truth? don't care, still voting for Trump"

Good job getting Trump elected lefties.
Half of the Hasan clips you can find from the internet are also taken out of context and with a narrative to paint him in the bad light. Are you now going to deny all of his wrongdoings? Quoting you: "why would anyone believe anything negative about him even if it could be true?".

You see how ridiculous that sounds when I do 180.

Nothing really changes if you take "Kill them, gut them! Make the streets run red with their capitalist blood!" out of context bro..

#11

Dom 12 Oct @ 10:59pm

Originally posted by trash can:
Originally posted by Dom:
Half of the Hasan clips you can find from the internet are also taken out of context and with a narrative to paint him in the bad light. Are you now going to deny all of his wrongdoings? Quoting you: "why would anyone believe anything negative about him even if it could be true?".

You see how ridiculous that sounds when I do 180.
Nothing really changes if you take "Kill them, gut them! Make the streets run red with their capitalist blood!" out of context bro..

And nothing really changes if you take "I could shoot someone on the street and still be supported" or "second amendment people could act against Hillary Clinton" out of context bro.

Last edited by Dom; 12 Oct @ 11:00pm

#12

trash can 12 Oct @ 11:03pm

Originally posted by Dom:
Originally posted by trash can:
Nothing really changes if you take "Kill them, gut them! Make the streets run red with their capitalist blood!" out of context bro..
And nothing really changes if you take "I could shoot someone on the street and still be supported" or "second amendment people could act against Hillary Clinton" out of context bro.

Both of those are stupid jokes, not active calls to violence in a shrieking rage-filled tangent, not comparable bro

#13

Dom 12 Oct @ 11:05pm

Originally posted by trash can:
Originally posted by Dom:
And nothing really changes if you take "I could shoot someone on the street and still be supported" or "second amendment people could act against Hillary Clinton" out of context bro.
Both of those are stupid jokes, not active calls to violence in a shrieking rage-filled tangent, not comparable bro

So calling "second amendment people" against your main political opponent is just "lel funny joke" bro? Cool...

That's fine.

If that's the standard we are going with, I'm going to conclude everything Hasan has ever said about going after political opponents is "lel funny joke" then.

Last edited by Dom; 12 Oct @ 11:06pm

#14

trash can 12 Oct @ 11:08pm

Originally posted by Dom:
Originally posted by trash can:
Both of those are stupid jokes, not active calls to violence in a shrieking rage-filled tangent, not comparable bro
So calling "second amendment people" against your political opponent is just "lel funny joke" bro? Cool...

Fine.

If that's the standard, I'm going to say everything Hasan has ever said about going after political opponents is "lel funny joke" then.

you don't have to, Hasan already does that himself, often saying "in a video game" after calling for violence, which is oddly something one would historically associate with edgy far right wingers.

"Yes, the time I told my viewers to murder their enemies and cut their stomachs until their guts fall out, I was being hyperbolic."

"Yes that time I told my viewers to kill people and spill their blood i meant in a video game"

He's basically the equivalent of the violent psychopathic edgy 4channer but he has a coat of leftist paint so suddenly you love him

#15

< >

Showing 1-15 of 55 comments

Per page: 1530 50

All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details

Date Posted: 12 Oct @ 11:38am

Posts: 55

Start a New Discussion