Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Hence the difference in punishment.
What is legally defined as a 'child' is also something the courts can address on a per-case basis.
the alternative is executing them, but only if they're below a certain age.
You'll find that's all of them.
They should be thoroughly examined and treated with some sort of therapy, in hopes to find out what is wrong with their deranged mentality and what the root cause was, and possibly find a solution so that it can be prevented from happening again to them or another youth.
There are solutions to nearly everything..... usually.
Kids? Depends on the age and circumstances, IMO.
so we should look for the emotionless benefit to the situation, as this killer most likely did, and use them in inhumane medical experimentation.
i guess when the state uses people's lives for its own purposes its okay, but when citizens do it ... ?