Ohiyah puggerly, how'sh u doinn's todae?

I already made a post on this https://gtm.steamproxy.vip/discussions/forum/12/597413522043867063/?ctp=6 uwu

Wait your saying the side with the tree huggers and the "I hope evryone has a better life and evry life style is o.k as long as you dont hinder others" type of ppl arent the evil ones ????

Political...

The exception that confirms the rule that liberals are evil

Diposting pertama kali oleh BuhnieBealla:

I already made a post on this https://gtm.steamproxy.vip/discussions/forum/12/597413522043867063/?ctp=6 uwu

Oh gosh dang it all, why am I always le last one to hear dis stuff.

Diposting pertama kali oleh Lime:

Ohiyah puggerly, how'sh u doinn's todae?

Well, I’m grumpy and nauseous, fir now at least.

Diposting pertama kali oleh Puggly the Grey:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Lime:

Ohiyah puggerly, how'sh u doinn's todae?

Well, I’m grumpy and nauseous, fir now at least. :nkMad:

deed ur ownur not giv u uh belly rub? D:

death penalty

I guess it isnt common sense anymore that political affiliation doesnt correlate with mental illness. This kind of statement is no different than claiming any other group (black, ♥♥♥, or whatever) are a threat to anyone. Anyone can go online and find a story that, sure on the surface seems to fuel their narrative but honestly its just broad generalizations. You probably only made this thread to push back at the contrasting narrative that the other side is guilty of this as well but two wrongs dont make a right.

Diposting pertama kali oleh Rakshasa:

i think this is being blown out of proportion. should this guy get jail time? of course. but he wasn't the assailant or perpetrator. the fact that this guy in the video is threatening the death penalty... I think that's worse. murderers often wont get the death penalty. hardcore red states dont hand out the death penalty like this guy wants. dude is unhinged

So…because he didn’t SA the children himself, but rather jus paid other creatures to do it for him, dat somehow makes him less monstrous?

Are chu insane?!

Also, der’s evidence to suggest dat he may has been abusin’ his own children as well, he deserves absolutely no leniency at all.

the charges were distribution not solicitation. he didn't pay anyone to commit those crimes.

yes I do think possession, distribution, solicitation and perpetration are all different crimes which require different sentences

Diposting pertama kali oleh ItIsFrog:

I guess it isnt common sense anymore that political affiliation doesnt correlate with mental illness. This kind of statement is no different than claiming any other group (black, ♥♥♥, or whatever) are a threat to anyone. Anyone can go online and find a story that, sure on the surface seems to fuel their narrative but honestly its just broad generalizations. You probably only made this thread to push back at the contrasting narrative that the other side is guilty of this as well but two wrongs dont make a right.

No, if chu go online, what chu can find is a bunch of lyin’ righties tryin’ to falsely claim dat dis bad peep, or dat bad peep, was somehow a leftist, but der evidence is always the flimsiest nonsense one could possibly imagine.

Diposting pertama kali oleh Puggly the Grey:

Diposting pertama kali oleh ItIsFrog:

I guess it isnt common sense anymore that political affiliation doesnt correlate with mental illness. This kind of statement is no different than claiming any other group (black, ♥♥♥, or whatever) are a threat to anyone. Anyone can go online and find a story that, sure on the surface seems to fuel their narrative but honestly its just broad generalizations. You probably only made this thread to push back at the contrasting narrative that the other side is guilty of this as well but two wrongs dont make a right.

No, if chu go online, what chu can find is a bunch of lyin’ righties tryin’ to falsely claim dat dis bad peep, or dat bad peep, was somehow a leftist, but der evidence is always the flimsiest nonsense one could possibly imagine. :lunar2019deadpanpig:

Look up availability bias. You fail to see how you're just going off of what individuals say and applying that to everyone in a particular group.
This is the exact polarizing rhetoric that spreads more division and pits us all against eachother. The majority of people here are against these kinds of things regardless of idealogy, political affiliation, or any other characteristic it is you feel the need to attack. Again, youre no better than anyone else making such broad claims. I feel like youre just going tit for tat at this point

And the church gets a free pass?